Laserfiche WebLink
third well went dry last yeaz. The fact that the wells went dry seems to be explainable. <br />(See accompanying paper on Southfield Hydrology.) <br />Groundwater <br />from PHC predictions: <br />1. There will be minor reductions in downgradient groundwater flows. <br />It was pointed out in the permit that no domestic or agricultural groundwater wells are <br />completed within the Vermejo formation. A review of State Engineer's records on 9 <br />July 2003 confirmed this. There are no registered wells within aone-mile radius of the <br />mine facilities and no registered wells in or near the JOL seam (and probably not in the <br />Vermejo formation at all) for a distance of more than two miles down-gradient. The <br />surface elevation rises considerably to the North of the mine area, decreasing the <br />probability that any wells would be drilled into the Vermejo from that unpopulated azea. <br />Further north, the synclinal axis flows beneath the alluvium of the Arkansas River and its <br />tributaries, much more easily accessible and productive groundwater sources than the <br />tight Vennejo formation. <br />Water level data from the wells MW-8 and MW-65 indicate that there may be minor <br />reductions, as predicted. The level of MW-8 dropped significantly for a period of three <br />years (1993 through 1995) but then recovered to its original level before caving when <br />mined through. The water level in MW-65 dropped 40 feet in 1987 and has remained <br />essentially steady since then. Based on these data there appears to have been minor <br />reduction in flow. <br />2. There will possibly be dewatering of the Vento Seam <br />The Vento Seam, approximately 100 feet above the Southside mining interval, is not <br />monitored by any means that I can identify. The Rex Carbon seam was tapped by two <br />wells. There is no means, therefore, to directly test the prediction. <br />3. There will be localized drops in the piezomentric surface. <br />Based on existing data, this occurred briefly (for a couple years) and to a small extent. <br />My interpretation is that the rocks aze so "tight" that dewatering does not occur over a <br />great distance and the traditional concept of "cone of depression" may occur only within <br />an individual unit (not across strata). <br />4. There will be local alterations in the groundwater flow patterns <br />There is no evidence of this one way or the other. <br />