My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP24825
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP24825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:39 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:05:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/21/2003
Doc Name
2002 AHR Review Memo
From
Jim Burnell
To
Jim Stark
Annual Report Year
2002
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
third well went dry last yeaz. The fact that the wells went dry seems to be explainable. <br />(See accompanying paper on Southfield Hydrology.) <br />Groundwater <br />from PHC predictions: <br />1. There will be minor reductions in downgradient groundwater flows. <br />It was pointed out in the permit that no domestic or agricultural groundwater wells are <br />completed within the Vermejo formation. A review of State Engineer's records on 9 <br />July 2003 confirmed this. There are no registered wells within aone-mile radius of the <br />mine facilities and no registered wells in or near the JOL seam (and probably not in the <br />Vermejo formation at all) for a distance of more than two miles down-gradient. The <br />surface elevation rises considerably to the North of the mine area, decreasing the <br />probability that any wells would be drilled into the Vermejo from that unpopulated azea. <br />Further north, the synclinal axis flows beneath the alluvium of the Arkansas River and its <br />tributaries, much more easily accessible and productive groundwater sources than the <br />tight Vennejo formation. <br />Water level data from the wells MW-8 and MW-65 indicate that there may be minor <br />reductions, as predicted. The level of MW-8 dropped significantly for a period of three <br />years (1993 through 1995) but then recovered to its original level before caving when <br />mined through. The water level in MW-65 dropped 40 feet in 1987 and has remained <br />essentially steady since then. Based on these data there appears to have been minor <br />reduction in flow. <br />2. There will possibly be dewatering of the Vento Seam <br />The Vento Seam, approximately 100 feet above the Southside mining interval, is not <br />monitored by any means that I can identify. The Rex Carbon seam was tapped by two <br />wells. There is no means, therefore, to directly test the prediction. <br />3. There will be localized drops in the piezomentric surface. <br />Based on existing data, this occurred briefly (for a couple years) and to a small extent. <br />My interpretation is that the rocks aze so "tight" that dewatering does not occur over a <br />great distance and the traditional concept of "cone of depression" may occur only within <br />an individual unit (not across strata). <br />4. There will be local alterations in the groundwater flow patterns <br />There is no evidence of this one way or the other. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.