Laserfiche WebLink
• Monitored water quality parameters at these wells during 1997 returned values within <br />previously established ranges. <br />In general, the spoil groundwater has comparable dissolved solids concentrations to most of <br />the spoil spring discharge, but much higher values than in the background bedrock ground <br />water. Much of spoil ground water is acalcium-sulfate type with relatively high bicarbonate <br />and low SAR. Spring 114, located just downgradient from wells 001-SP-6 and 001-SP-7, <br />typically exhibits higher sodium and sulfate levels than other spoil springs. The water quality <br />data for spoil wells does not indicate any significant changes in trace metals concentrations <br />have occurred over time. <br />SURFACE WATER MONITORING <br />Foidel Creek: Four surface flow monitoring sites on Foidel Creek in the vicinity of the CYCC <br />mined areas and facilities areas are utilized. Site 14 provides data from the undisturbed <br />watershed area adjacent to (northeast of) Eckman Park. Site 800 is located a short distance <br />downstream from Eckman Park below the confluence of the Pond A discharge and site 14 and <br />flows at this station are monitored by the USGS (Station 09243800). Site 8 is located a short <br />distance downstream of the Foidel Creek mine portal area below Mine 1. And lastly, site 900 <br />is located further downstream above the confluence with Middle Creek. Flows at site 900 are <br />also are monitored by the USGS (Station 09243900). During 1997, all four Foidel Creek <br />surface water monitoring sites required monthly flow and field parameter measurements with <br />quarterly water quality sample collection. The monitoring requirements are further described to <br />require 12 flow and field parameter monitoring instances to occur between March and <br />• September along with 4 water quality sampling events. One additional site on Foidel Creek, <br />site 304, required water level monitoring on a monthly basis in conjunction with alluvial well <br />008-AV-2. All required monitoring instances were completed during 1997. <br />Tables 18 through 22 provide summaries of the 1997 Water Year data collected at each site. <br />Tables 18a through 21a provide period of record statistical summaries of collected data at <br />specified sites. Table 22a provides a water level summary for site 304. Figures 32 through 47 <br />provide graphical representations of flow rates and selected water quality parameters recorded <br />at each site. Typical flow patterns were exhibited at these sites with spring runoff periods <br />accounting for the peak flows observed. Runoff magnitudes were slightly higher than average <br />during 1997 based upon comparison with previous years data. At all of these sites, the <br />inverse relationship between flow and field conductivity continues to be evident, though not as <br />pronounced as in previous years. Water quality parameter analyses conducted at these sites <br />during the year returned values within previously established ranges with the exceptions of a <br />new minimum sulfate figure reported at site 8 in September. <br />The base level of field conductivity measured during the fall was higher in the downstream <br />sites on Foidel Creek. It measured approximately 900 umhos/cm in the upstream site (14) and <br />approximately 2800 umhos/cm in the downstream sites 8 and 800. Since approximately 1981, <br />the base level for conductivity at both downstream sites has been increasing although there <br />appears to have been a leveling off since approximately 1989. The upstream site also reflects <br />a notable conductivity increase in 1986, but appears to be slowly declining. <br />The difference between the conductivities at the upstream and downstream stations is <br />attributable primarily to spoil spring discharges related to surface mining. These discharges <br />• cause increased concentrations of dissolved solids, calcium, magnesium, and sulfate and a <br />reduction in SAR in Foidel Creek. However, the increase in TDS levels during irrigation <br />EP97TEXT.DOC 07/01/98 5 <br />