My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP24312
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP24312
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:20 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:56:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/2/2000
Doc Name
PRE-MINING STREAM CHANNEL CONDITIONS ON DEEP CREEK
From
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS INC
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Memorandum to Hemy Bazbe, MCC <br />July 28, 2000 <br />t Page 2 <br />' sand with a diameter of about 0.30 millimeters. The other photographs, Photo 2 through Photo 8 <br />were taken proceeding upstream from the Lower gage towazd the Upper gage. <br />' All photographs with the exception of Photo 6 aze examples of the channel hydraulic <br />characteristics, vegetative growth, old logjams, bankline slopes, bank sediments both stable and <br />eroding, and the bed material in the channel bottom. Photo 6 shows the sand size sediments <br />' deposited above the approximate 8-foot high beaver dam. This lazge deposit of sand above the <br />beaver dam along with deposits of sand material between the cobbles or boulders in the channel <br />' support the significant quantity of sand size sediments being transported in the channel during <br />flood flows. There were several locations of an eroding bank such as shown on Photo 4 where <br />finer silt size sediments would be eroded and transported downstream. <br />In general, Deep Creek is a perennial stream that is well incised and is degrading over time. The <br />rate of degradation is slow as evidence by the cobbles and boulders scattered over the streambed. <br />' The channel bottom has not become fully armored. Thus, further degradation can be expected. <br />but with the amount of lazge rocks in the channel the degradation of the streambed is minimal. <br />There is also the added control of vertical degradation provided by the logjams. Although there <br />' is an abundance of trees and vegetative growth along the banks, there will be some amount of <br />ban/: erosion. The added problem due to logjams is the shifting or possible change in channel <br />location provided by a large log or group of logs that will become lodged in the main channel. <br />' EXISTING CHANNEL HYDRAULICS <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />lJ <br />Hydraulic parameters for the existing Deep Creek channel are best defined for the dominant or <br />channel forming discharge. The channel forming discharge is the steady discharge, which would <br />give the channel the same morphology as a natural sequence of discharges. The channel forming <br />discharge is also frequently referred to as the dominant, formative, effective or regime discharge, <br />and can be defined as the discharge having hydraulic chazacteristics that forms and maintains the <br />channel. In analyzing Deep Creek the dominant discharge or bankfull discharge roughly equates <br />to a recurrence interval of a 2-year flood frequency. The hydrologic data provided by W WE used <br />in the channel hydraulic study for the Deep Creek study reach aze as follows: <br />Drainage Area <br />(S Mi Mean Annual Runoff <br />AF/Yr Flood Frequency (cfs) <br />2- eaz 5- ear 100- ear <br />4.0 1900 55.6 114. ] 180 <br />' Field observations from the June 19, 2000 site visit indicate a Manning's "n" of 0.065 for the <br />channel. This "n" was further supported by values shown in the USGS Water-Supply Paper <br />1849, "Roughness Characteristics of Natural Channels." The width of channel at dominant <br />' discharge varied from about 3 to 15 feet. This would give an average width of 9 feet. The depth <br />of flow for this width would be about 1.0 foot. The slope from Figure 1 is 0.049 fi/fi. With these <br />' Wright Water Engineers, Inc., 2490 W. 26°t Avenue, Ste. t00A, Denver, CO 80211 <br />Tel. 3031480-1700; faz. 303/460-1020, e-mail:krwright~dwrightwater com <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.