My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP24211
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP24211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:17 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:55:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1990 AHR text and data
Annual Report Year
1990
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />n <br />l~ <br />inflow from undisturbed areas downstream of TR-C contain approximately the <br />same concentrations of these parameters as runoff from the mine. <br />As noted in previous annual hydrology reports, upstream of the mine on <br />Trout Creek, bicarbonate (Figure 5) is the major anion with sulfate (Figure 5) <br />concentrations increasing rapidly along the mine area to become predominating <br />downstream. The sulfate levels increase is most markedly noticed prior to the <br />peak flow period of Trout Creek as are TDS levels in general. This increase <br />is probably caused by early runoff at the mine site leaching pyritic and <br />' organic sulfur as flow passes over and through the spoils. Since the flow of <br />Trout Creek is low at that time, the amount of sulfur is sufficient to cause <br />' an ionic shift from a bicarbonate type water to a sulfate type. An <br />equalization in the sulfate-bicarbonate balance occurs downstream as the <br />' source of the sulfate (mined areas) is unavailable and dilution by runoff from <br />undisturbed areas is introduced. During periods of higher flow the input of <br />sulfate is insufficient to shift the anion component to a sulfate type with <br />' concentrations of bicarbonate and sulfate being approximately equal at TR-D. <br />Manganese (Figure 6) shows fairly consistent values since the fall of 1981, <br />except during 1984. At that time, a dramatic increase occurred upstream of <br />TR-A with significant dilution being observed at each successive monitoring <br />point along the mine area. The dilution was caused by the low concentrations <br />present in water exiting from the mine vicinity. All the manganese values <br />' observed, except May, 1984, are consistent with the baseline values. The <br />relatively high values of manganese observed at TR-C (0.13 mg/1) and TR-D <br />(0.16 mg/1) during May of 1988 did not appear to be related to mining activity <br />' as an elevated concentration was not observed at TR-B (0.04 mq/1) which is <br />immediately downstream of the active mine. <br />Orthophosphate (Figure 7), nitrite (Figure 7), unionized ammonia (Figure <br />8), and dissolved aluminum (Figure 8) were added to the monitoring program in <br />' 1988. All values obtained during 1988, 1989, and 1990 for these parameters <br />were low with most being below detection limits (Appendix 1). Orthophosphate <br />and unionized ammonia showed some perturbation during the 1990 sampling <br />' period. These values, however, are low at slightly above detection limits. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.