My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23861
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:05 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:50:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973021
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/5/2003
Doc Name
Geotechnical Addendum-2002 Annual Report
From
Haley & Aldrich Inc.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I~ <br />V. GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS <br />5.01 General <br />Specific slope stability analyses were conducted and required for mining activities performed <br />' during 2002 in the North Quarry. Observed conditions were compared with conditions <br />identified in Technical Revision No. 3, which allowed for modification of the slope to steeper <br />than 1H:1V. <br />Specific slope stability analyses were not conducted nor required for mining activities <br />performed during 2002 in the Central Quarry. Rather, observed general conditions were <br />compared with conditions observed previously. <br />In Amendment No. 3, two rock mass conditions were identified for design purposes, and <br />used as the baseline for further evaluations. The two baseline conditions were "competent <br />rock", representing the majority of expected conditions, and "poor rock" representing <br />localized azeas of shearing, weathering or adverse jointing. Note that the term rock mass <br />incorporates the parent rock material plus jointing and other characteristics that influence <br />behavior of the mass. Typical in-situ rock mass characteristics and the corresponding <br />strength envelopes and calculated safety factors for each of these baseline conditions were <br />presented in Amendment No. 3, Section 4-04. <br />The general ground conditions observed relative to the baseline conditions for each of the <br />azeas worked are described in the following sections along with a summary of the geologic <br />mapping performed on the new fmal highwalls established in 2002. <br />5.02 Central Quarry <br />A. East Side <br />The overall slope appears stable. As identified in previous geotechnical addenda, there are <br />localized areas of instability on individual benches. These typically occur where the primary <br />joint set strikes parallel with the slope and daylights out of the highwalls, and where <br />secondary joint set(s) occur and serve as detachment planes. Localized wedge and slab slip <br />surfaces were observed on the outside edges of individual benches. These slip surfaces are <br />infrequent and are relatively small, generally less than 10 feet in length. These features are <br />as expected for the highwall and only cause localized operational inconveniences. <br />Twenty-six surface survey points (numbered 2001 through 2026) were established [o monitor <br />the effectiveness of the repair of the unstable slope on Benches 6 and 7. Positions of the <br />surface survey points provide data to assess the performance of the slide repair during 1998. <br />Several survey points have been damaged by mining activities. All the remaining points <br />' exhibited less than 0.01 fr of displacement from August 2000 [o April 2002, indicating stable <br />slope conditions. Survey information is provided in Appendix A. <br />' B. South End, North End, and West Side <br />The overall slope in the south end appears stable. There are localized areas of instability on <br />' individual benches due to "poor" rock mass conditions. Localized areas of instability were <br />G:\PROI ECTS\20200 Morrison Quarry\008\2002\2002 geotechnical adderidum.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.