My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23842
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:04 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1995 AHR & ARR VEGETATION
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~• <br />,~ <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br /> <br />~J <br /> <br />'• <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~• <br />'i~ <br />Perennial grass production dominated total herbaceous production for all reclaimed <br />azeas in 1995, ranging from 80.5 to 94.5 percent of the total herbaceous production. <br />Perennial grass production from the Osgood Sand Reference Area was also the <br />dominant component, totaling 58% of the total production. Interestingly, the forb <br />component contribution to herbaceous production rose significantly from 1994 to 1995 <br />in three of the four areas sampled. In the Osgood Sand Reference Area forb <br />herbaceous production rose from ]1.5 percent to 40.8 percent. In the 1985 <br />Reclamation Area the forb contribution doubled from 3.0 to 6.8 percent. In the 1987 <br />Reclamation Area the forb contribution increased by more than 2000 percent from 0.9 <br />to 19.1 percent. The only azea that did not show an increase in forb representation was <br />the 1986 Reclamation Area. Forb representation in herbaceous production dropped <br />slightly from 1944 to 1995 (6.640 to 4.546). <br />SPECIES COMPOSITION <br />The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology considers species composition of the <br />revegetated and reclaimed areas to be an indicator of successful vegetation <br />establishment. A standard has been set by CDMG for the evaluation of species <br />composition at the Keenesburg Mine. To be judged successful, at final bond release, <br />this standard requires that, "the species composition on the reclaimed azea is such that <br />there aze at least seven perennial species of which four are warm season grasses and <br />one is a forb. No one component of the above species should comprise greater than <br />4046 relative importance nor less than 3% relative importance. Relative importance <br />will be measured by calculating relative cover of the revegetation species. Vegetation ~ <br />species which may be used in the calculation of species composition may be any plant ~,.~"~ <br />species not defined as a noxious or prohibited plant species, and may be native or cc~~ <br />introduced." <br />Species presence and representation on the reclaimed azeas as well as the reference azea <br />was significantly greater in terms of absolute numbers than in 1994. A comparison of <br />the 1995 species composition data with the revegetation success standard reveals that <br />none of the azeas sampled in 1995 would meet the species composition success <br />standazd. <br />The azea with the lowest number of qualifying species was the 1986 Reclamation Area. <br />This area had six species (three warm season grasses, two cool season grasses, and one <br />forb) with the required relative importance. However, two species were disqualified; <br />one being an "undesirable" annual grass and the other being an annual forb (even <br />though it is a native species). The 1985 Reclamation Area had the most perennial <br />species within the relative importance constraints of the standazd. The 1985 area met <br />the warm season grass requirement, but did not meet the perennial forb requirement. <br />The 1987 Reclamation Area had five qualifying perennial species, and lacked two <br />warm season grasses and one forb with sufficient relative cover to meet the standard. <br />-14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.