Laserfiche WebLink
14096 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 57 / Tuesday. March 25, 1997 / Proposed Rules <br /> which substantive data on biological counties—along South Boulder Creek Compton and Hugie (1993) found it <br /> vulnerability and threats were not and St. Vrain Creek (Boulder County): difficult to assess historical trends and <br /> available to support a proposed rule. within drainages at Rocky Flats and current status of Preble's due to the <br /> On August 16. 1994, the Service along Coal Creek Qefferson County); scarcity of demographic data.They <br /> received a petition from the Biodiversity along East Plum Creek and West Plum recommended that Preble's be federally <br /> Legal Foundation to list all known Creek (Douglas County); and, along listed as a threatened species. However. <br /> populations of the Preble's meadow Monument Creek within the Air Force after a largely unsuccessful search for <br /> jumping mouse as endangered or Academy and along Smith Creek (El suitable habitat in Wyoming and <br /> threatened throughout its range and to Paso County). In Wyoming, Preble's has unsuccessful trapping surveys for <br /> designate critical habitat within a been recently documented in two Preble's at five sites in southeastern <br /> reasonable amount of time following the counties, along Crow Creek at F.E. Wyoming in 1993. they concluded that <br /> listing. The petitioner submitted Warren Air Force Base (Laramie County) Preble's might be extirpated from <br /> information that Preble's meadow and in the Lodgepole Creek drainage, Wyoming (Compton and Hugie 1994). <br /> jumping mouse populations in Colorado within the Medicine Bow National Their revised recommendation was that <br /> and Wyoming are imperiled by— Forest (Albany County). Documented Preble's be federally listed as an <br /> ongoing and increasing urban, populations at the Air Force Academy endangered species. Garber (1995) <br /> industrial, agricultural, ranching, and and Rocky Flats are by far the largest documented Preble's persisting at only <br /> recreational development:ongoing and known populations. Known Wyoming two Wyoming sites,commented on the <br /> increasing wetland/riparian habitat populations are separated from the difficulty of capturing Preble's on these <br /> destruction and/or modification:small closest known Colorado population by sites,and concluded that substantial <br /> size of known populations:and over 80 kilometers (km) (50 miles (mi)). additional work was needed to <br /> inadequacy or lack of governmental Preble's is not known to be present in determine the status of Preble's in <br /> protection for the species and its five counties in Colorado and three Wyoming. <br /> habitats. counties in Wyoming where previously Recent surveys for Preble's meadow <br /> On February 27. 1995, the 90-day documented. jumping mouse at a number of <br /> finding was approved. On March 15, Researchers are concerned with the additional locations in Colorado have <br /> 1995 (60 FR 13950-I3952). the Service lack of captures of Preble's at historical been unsuccessful in documenting <br /> published notice of the 90-day finding sites and other sites with suitable presence. Surveys funded and carried <br /> that the petition presented substantial out by the Department of the Army at <br /> information indicating that listing the habitat within its historical range and the Army's Fort Carson Military <br /> believe that habitat loss and <br /> Preble's meadow jumping mouse may fragmentation resulting from human Reservation in El Paso and Pueblo <br /> be warranted,and requested comments counties, resulted in no Preble's <br /> and biological data on the status of the land uses have adversely impacted captures despite 3,311 trapnights of <br /> Preble's populations,and continues to <br /> mouse. doo so. Ryon (1995) evaluated the current effort in apparently suitable habitat <br /> Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, as status of historical Preble's meadow (Bunn et al. 1995). Private researchers <br /> amended, requires the Secretary of the jumping sites in and U.S. Department of Agriculture's <br /> umpg mouse cap <br /> Interior to reach a final decision on any Forest Service (Forest Service) <br /> petition accepted for review within 12 Colorado, addressing both the mouse personnel found no Preble's in limited <br /> months of the receipt of the petition. presence and current habitat conditions. surveys of seemingly adequate habitats <br /> This proposal constitutes the final No Preble's were captured when Ryon within the Forest Service's Pawnee <br /> finding on the petitioned action. trapped six historical sites in five National Grassland in northern Weld <br /> counties. Ryon found the lack of County (Fred Harrington. pers. comm. <br /> Summary of Factors Affecting the captures "disturbing"and related 1995) <br /> Species absence of Preble's to changes in Dozens of site surveys for Preble's <br /> Section 4 of the Act and regulations habitat. He concluded that the range of meadowjumping mouse have been <br /> (50 CFR part 424) promulgated to Preble's has decreased, especially conducted by environmental <br /> implement the listing provisions of the adjacent to or east of the Interstate consultants in recent years at locations <br /> Act set forth the procedures for adding Highway 25 urban corridor. of anticipated development. Beane (Ron <br /> species to the Federal lists. A species Meaney and Clippinger (1995) Beane, MDG Inc., pers. comm. 1996) <br /> may be determined to be a threatened or reviewed aerial photographs of 9 reported conducting Preble's trapping <br /> endangered species due to one or more Colorado counties and, based on habitat surveys at 11 sites in 1996 with no <br /> of the five factors described in section and other factors, selected 16 priority captures. Aside from Harrington's <br /> 4(a)(1). These factors and their sites to survey for Preble's. Of these. (1995) work on East Plum Creek, none <br /> application to the Preble's meadow seven sites in five counties were of these site-specific predevelopment <br /> jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius surveyed in 1995, with priority given to surveys have resulted in Preble's <br /> preblet) are as follows: counties representing the boundaries of captures. <br /> A. The present or threatened suspected Preble's range. No Preble's Decline of the Preble's meadow <br /> destruction. modification, or were captured at these seven sites jumping mouse is linked to widespread <br /> curtailment of its habitat or range.The despite 6,750 trapnights of effort. habitat alteration. Ryon (1995) <br /> best indication of range curtailment and Extensive studies of public lands in commented that recent capture sites he <br /> current status is the lack of captures at Boulder County in 1995 documented observed were on large. historically <br /> historical sites and other sites with Preble's on only 2 of 13 sites surveyed undisturbed lands supporting native <br /> suitable habitat within its historical (Armstrong et al. 1996). Sites were plant communities. Compton and Hugie <br /> range. Since 1992, efforts to document selected based on documented historical (1993, 1994) cite human activities that <br /> existing populations of Preble's meadow presence and perceived quality of have adversely impacted Preble's <br /> jumping mouse have increased habitat. One conclusion of the study including: conversion of grasslands to <br /> commensurate with rising concern over was that suitable habitat appeared to be farms; livestock grazing:water <br /> its status. Presence of Preble's in present on some sites where trapping development and management <br /> Colorado has been documented in four was unsuccessful. practices: and, residential and <br />