My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23293
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:44 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:40:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/5/1999
Doc Name
1998 AHR text and data
Annual Report Year
1998
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Specific Conductivity/Total Dissolved Solids <br />Specific conductivity (Figure 23) and total dissolved solids (Figure 24) <br />values for the three alluvial wells have remained fairly constant over the majority <br />of the period of record. While Conductivity and TDS values at sites TR-3 and TR-4 <br />are consistent with values obtained during the baseline studies, these parameters <br />and several others have elevated rapidly and remained elevated at TR-1.5 since 1995. <br />The source of the elevated values is not readily identifiable. A few factors which <br />may have contributed to the elevated values were mentioned in the 1996 Report (i.e., <br />inundation of the area in late spring of 1995 and the laying of telephone cable <br />immediately upstream of the area during the summer of 1995). Lf the elevated values <br />resulted from those activities, the values should have returned to more historic <br />levels during the 1996, 1997 and 1998 monitoring periods. However, the values have <br />remained elevated. It appears that the alluvium in this area is reflecting upstream <br />alluvial water containing high levels of TDS, possibly from an old abandoned <br />underground mine up the Little Trout Creek drainage. This conclusion is based <br />partially on the similarity of the water quality between TR-1.5 and WR-1. As <br />previously discussed in the surface water section, data taken between October 1990 <br />and August 1992 is believed to be invalid due to instrument errors. <br />Conductivity and TDS in Well WR-1 have progressed from an elevated state each <br />spring to a lower state in the fall for the past several years. This phenomenon was <br />caused by infiltration of snowmelt water leaching various minerals within the <br />unsaturated zone of reclaimed spoil. As the enriched flow was released over the <br />course of the summer, the conductivity values lessened to that of the stagnant <br />saturated zone. The 1996-1998 data suggests that the unsaturated zone may be almost <br />depleted of leachate. The mounded aquifer exhibits a more diluted state each spring <br />with a return to steady-state as the summer progresses. <br />Calcium/Magnesium/Sodium <br />Calcium (Figure 25) is the major cation found in all of the wells with <br />concentrations of sodium (Figure 26) and magnesium (Figure 27) occurring in lesser <br />quantities. TR-1.5 generally contained the lowest concentrations of cations with a <br />slight increase occurring downstream at TR-3 and TR-4 for the majority of the <br />record. However, elevated levels of these parameters at TR-1.5 began to occur in <br />1995 consistent with the elevated Conductivity and TDS levels previously mentioned. <br />The sodium level for WR-1 of 454 mg/1 obtained during October 1991 is believed <br />to be an analytical error. Levels measured prior to and after that sample dace do <br />not support the high concentration and followed the expected trend. <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.