My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23225
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:38:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/27/2004
Doc Name
2003 Annual Hydrology Report & Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2003
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2.4 Species Composition <br />• Species composition information was derived from quantitative vegetation cover data. <br />Relative cover information provided a basis for evaluation of the importance of each <br />encountered plarn species and lifeform and for comparison to the final revegetation <br />success criterion. <br />2.3 SAMPLE NUMBERS/SAMPLE ADEQUACY <br />For the purposes of this monitoring, set numbers of samples were established for the <br />parameters to be sampled by Savage and Savage and Coors Energy Comparry. The <br />number of samples taken for each reclamation yeaz was consistem with numbers agreed to <br />in the past by CDMG. In each revegetated area, the size and number of parcels dictated <br />the total number of samples taken, as described above. <br />Since the purpose of this sampling was the monitoring of the vegetative condition at the <br />revegetated azeas of the mine and Osgood sand reference azea, sampling need not meet <br />sample adequacy requirements. Minimum sample sizes and standazd deviation aze <br />reported as an indication of variability of the sampled parameters. Comparisons between <br />sample mean parameter values assume that the sample mean value accurately represents <br />the population mean in all cases. <br />2.4 SPECIES IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION <br />• Species identification was accomplished in the field through the use of plant identification <br />keys (Harrington, 1954, Weber, 1990; Whitson, 1987; Zimdahl, 1990, Stubbendieck, et a1, <br />1995). In cases where plain identification was inconclusive in the field, voucher specimens <br />were pressed for lab idettification. <br />3.0 RESULTS <br />3.1 QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION: REFERENCE & RECLAMATION AREAS <br />3.1.1 OSGOOD SAND REFERENCE AREA <br />The Osgood sand reference area represents approximately 3.4 acres of undisturbed native <br />vegetation within the Keenesburg lbfine permit area. The reference area is sited <br />immediately west of the mine access road and has been fenced to prevent grazing by <br />domesticated livestock. The reference azea is flat and exhibits sheet flow drainage to the <br />east-southeast. Soils are generally sandy in texture, with little incorporated organic <br />matter. <br />The vegetation community was visually dominated by the woody shnrb Artemisia frlifolia <br />• (sand sage), and cool season graminoid Stipa viridula (green needlegrass). Three warm <br />Cooro Energy Company Page 5 <br />1A03 ReregeEatbn Monkoring Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.