My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23225
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:38:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/27/2004
Doc Name
2003 Annual Hydrology Report & Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2003
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I~ <br />I,ocatlon Cover <br />o<~ ~ 13e~n. Prod. <br />of ~ <br />t99s xeseedr~ater~alH <br />Area 2 of m 2.0 as 1 2 <br />Area 7 of'87 Area 1.6 ac. 1 1 <br />Area 10 S of B7 Area 9.7 ac. 0 0 <br />Area 15 of A Pit 2.7 ac. 1 2 <br />Area 26 S of sediment 6.2 ac. 3 4 <br />Total les Beseed/In 6 9 <br /> <br />1999 Recla®ation Areas <br />Area S S of T Piles 2.6 ac: 1 1 <br />Area 9 A Pit 15.3 ac. 4 4 <br />Total Ssm les 1999 Ares 5 5 <br />Sample sites were located in the field through compass triangulation and pacing from <br />known landmarks. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the location of the reference and reclaimed <br />areas and sample point locations for each area sampled. <br />During the initial overview of the sampling sites it was observed that Area 10 had burned <br />and while perennial vegetation was sprouting, it was concluded that this area should not <br />be included in quantitative sampling this year. To augment this years monitoring, the two <br />areas revegetated in 1999 (Areas 5 and 9) were proportionally sampled. <br />In the areas reclaimed in 1985, 1986, 1987, 2000, and 2002 a qualitative evaluation of <br />• revegetation success was undertaken this year. The 1985, 1986, and 1987 areas were <br />previously monitored (19941998) and after successfully meeting revegetation success <br />criteria, were released from the Phase II liability requiremems by the Colorado Division of <br />iVImerals and Geology August 11, 1998. This year, qualitative evaluation of these areas <br />included estimating vegetative cover, herbaceous production, and identifying the dominant <br />plant species. Aay locations or trends in vegetation development that required attention <br />were also noted. The areas revegetated in 2000 (Areas 6 and 19) and 2002 (Area 25) <br />were qualitatively evaluated this year. Area 29 was seeded in the autumn of 2003 and was <br />not evaluated. <br />The Osgood sand reference area was measured and mapped in the field in 1994 by Savage <br />and Savage staff; and this scaled drawing of the reference area was used. On the scaled <br />drawing, a Cartesian coordinate grid (50x50 feet) was established. Computer generated <br />random numbers were used to establish a pool of x,y coordinates. Ten vegetation cover <br />and fifteen herbaceous production sample locations were randomly established for the <br />reference area. Sample sites were located in the field through compass triangulation and <br />pacing from ]mown landmarks. <br /> <br />Cooro Energy Company Page 5 <br />2005 Revegetation MonltorMg Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.