My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:38:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977285
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/27/1981
From
UNION CARBIDE CORP
To
MLR
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL FEE / REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 8, 1981 <br />Mr. Claude A. Thormalen <br />Environmental Engineer <br />Union Carbide Corporation <br />McCals Division <br />Uravan, Colorado 81436 <br />Sin rC qi COtonnno n~r,i ini~n i~inrn.~~,.~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Exac wive Dirocior <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />RE: The Sunday Mine and Deremo-Snyder Mine - Annual Reports <br />Our file nos. 77-285 and 77-288, respectively <br />J <br />Dear Mr. Thormalen: <br />Our Division has received and reviewed tl~e annual reports for the above cap- <br />tioned operations.. The annual fees of $275.00 for each mine have a:_so been <br />received, and the receipts for these fees are enclosed. In general, I find <br />these annual reports to be adequate under the terms of the Ptined Land Reclama- <br />tion Act. However, I do have one general question about the activity on each <br />site. I will ouCline the situation as I see it. <br />I note that the permit for the Sunday [•tine is to have an affected acreage of <br />20 and the permit for the Deremo-Snyder Mine is to leave an affected acreage <br />of 60. To date the affected acreages for these two mines are 14.7 and 51.5, <br />respectively. Although neither mine has a total disturbed acreage that ex- <br />ceeds the permit area, I am not sure from my examination of the original per- <br />mits whether or not the areas affected by the radio tower (in the case of the <br />Sunday Mine) and the new and(or planned vent holes (in the case of both mines) <br />were mentioned as affected land in the original permit. That is, are these <br />areas outside of the original permit boundaries? If this is the case, the <br />new areas of disturbance should be added on as amendments to the permits. <br />Please contact me and clarify this situation at your earliest convenience. <br />Thank you for your prompt attention to these annual reports. <br />Sincerely, <br />Mark S. Loye <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />7 <br />Enclosures <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.