Laserfiche WebLink
DMG Concern <br />2. No water elevation (or depth) is shown for 001-83-107. <br />TCC Response <br />Due to this well being artesian in nature, the water level readings are in PSI units as noted in <br />the comments, which were converted for numeric elevations. These elevations were utilized <br />in the Figure for this site showing water level, but were not transitioned into the data sheets. <br />TCC apologizes for this oversight, and will try to prevent a recurrence. The revised data sheet <br />has been enclosed. <br />DMG Concern <br />Surface Water <br />There were no May values for site 7. <br />TCC Response <br />The missing reading for Site 7 was collected on May 28, but was entered under an alternate <br />site ID in the database, which resulted in the sampling instance being omitted from the report. <br />The database has been corrected, and the revised data sheet is enclosed. <br />DMG Concern <br />2. No June level was shown for Site 305 or Site 307. <br />TCC Response <br />The readings for the period in question are as follow: <br />Site 305 -1.07 6/30/92 <br />Site 307 -1.35 6/30/92 <br />The revised data sheets are enclosed. <br />DMG Concern <br />3. There are no flow values for site 800. <br />TCC Response <br />As discussed, TCC only collects a water level at this site in conjunction with the field <br />parameters and quarterly samples, as the flow monitoring is conducted by the USGS. <br />