My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP22811
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP22811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:29 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:34:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/22/1993
Doc Name
FOIDEL CREEK MINE PN C-82-056 1992 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT REVIEW
From
CYPRUS YAMPA VALLEY COAL CO
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w, <br />>~ crpEtus III111~II~II~11~~11 <br />C Yampa Valley <br />Cyprus Yampa Valley Coal Corporation <br />29587 Routt County Road +r27 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />303-879-3800 <br />October 20, 1993 <br />Kent Gorham <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />OCT 2 2 1y93 <br /> <br />Re: Foidel Creek Mine, Permit No. C-82-056, 1992 Annual Hvdroloov Report Review <br />Dear Mr. Gorham; <br />Enclosed, please find the responses to the above referenced AHR review. Each Division <br />concern has been re-stated, and is immediately followed by the TCC response. <br />General Comments and Errors/Omissions <br />DMG Concern <br />1 . The copy of the map titled "Designated Locations Hydrologic Monitoring Program" is <br />badly faded to the point that contour lines, stream locations, and other features cannot <br />be seen. Please provide an accurate, legible map in the 1993 AHR submittal. <br />TCC Response <br />The new map will be submitted as requested. <br />DMG Concern <br />2. A number of items noted previously by the Division were to be corrected in the 1992 <br />AHR as per a commitment by TCC in the 1991 AHR review response. Many of these <br />were not done and are as follows: <br />a) Elevation information is incorrect for site 27A. <br />TCC Response <br />The corrected information has been enclosed. <br />DMG Concern <br />b} Site 14 data is not included but is part of the plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.