Laserfiche WebLink
<br />' Annual Hydrology Report <br />April 28, 1988 <br />Page 13 <br />1 adjacent to the coal seam can cause localized movement of this water into the <br />mine workings. 7b date, groundwater movements of this type have occurred in <br />' areas of low cover which are highly fractured (near outcrops and near stream <br />channels) and where sandstone channels bearing water immediately overlie the <br />coal seam. Sewndly, retreat mining, which causes subsidence, can fracture <br />' overlying groundwater formations causing movement of the water, usually into the <br />mine workings. <br />The permeability of the F seam and overlying strata is very low and the areal <br />' extent and quantity of water stored in these units is small. <br />4 <br />The mine workings located near the outcrop, the main portal area, and along <br />' Sylvester Gulch behaved similarly to previous years with respect to inflows. <br />Inflows occurred primarily from the roof in areas of lchi overburden and near the <br />F seam outcrop. Inflow locations are essentially the same as previous years and <br />' are shown on Exhibit II. The estimated flows at these locations are also shown <br />on Exhibit II for low flow conditions as well a~ spring runoff conditions. <br />Table 1.4-3 shows total estimated sustained mine inflows for the 1987 water <br />year. <br />' The seasonal pattern of mine inflows observed in the mine working at the main <br />portal area and along Sylvester Gulch indicate that the wlluvium, coal, and <br />' bedrock recharge locally. The area along Sylvester Gulch wntains many <br />naturally occurring fractures. Water groves down slope through the colluvium and <br />fracture zones and discharges as springs and seeps. Water inflows appear to be <br />' controlled by precipitation (rtgstly snowmelt), depth of overburden, location and <br />extent of fracture zones and not by the extent of the underground workings. <br />Increased mine discharges during water year 1987 in the Sylvester Gulch fan area <br /> can be attributed to a concerted effort by WECC to keep the fan entries <br />' dewatered to a larger extent. This was done to prevent standing water from <br /> interfering with mine ventilation and to try to cut down on floor heave problems <br />' in the area. It is not likely <br />higher in 1987 than in 1986, but that <br />that mine inflow rates in <br />a trade off occurred. Sylvester Gulch were <br />The trade off being <br /> that water normally lost through seepage was actively pumped out of the mine. <br />' Mine water inflows for the 1988 water year in the Sylvester Gulch area and the <br />main portal area are expected to be similar to those of 1986 and 1967 water <br />years; however, precipitation wind have an impact on inflow rates if there is a <br />' dramatic change in 1988. <br />Mine water inflows for other areas of the mine, namely the 1st West Submain, <br />' Panels 1W25, 1W3S, 1W45, and the 1st East Submain are related to particular <br />geologic and topographic features as well as water bearing formations in these <br />areas. Fach area will be discussed in detail. <br />' 1st West Submain <br />The 1st West Submain was not actively mined during 1987. Areas previously <br />' mapped as wet or damp are shown on Exhibit II. This area remained somewhat <br />damp during 1987, but did not produce any measureable flows. The wet areas <br />of the 1st West Submain are thought to be associated with sandstone <br />channels which immediately or closely overlie the wal seam and with <br />' fracture zones in the Inane Pine Gulch area. <br />