My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP22705
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP22705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:26 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:31:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983090
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION REPORT LA POUDRE PIT SLURRY WALL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LJ <br />The soil-bentonite (S-B) backfill was composed of four components: 1) soil excavated from the trench, <br />1 2) high clay content soil material borrowed on-site, 3) slurry removed from the trench heading during <br />excavation, and 4) dry bentonite applied at a rate of 1.5 percent of the dry weight of the backfill soil. <br />OUALITYASSURANCETESTING <br />Construction engineering services were provided by RMC during the slurry wall construction. These <br />services included daily on-site construction observation, surveying, sampling, field testing of various <br />slurry trench parameters, and the assimilation of as-built information. A daily log of construction <br />progress was kept. <br />A material quality control program was followed throughout the slurry wall construction. Test types, <br />frequency, and specified values are summarized on Table 1. In order to provide the quickest possible <br />testing result turn-around time, a testing laboratory was set-up on site. Testing equipment included a <br />mud balance, Marsh funnel, portable electric bench oven, electronic scale, portable sieve shaker, <br />various sieves, wet washing sieve apparatus, ambient temperature filter press, pH meter, sand content <br />kit, and slump cone apparatus. General field results, listed by station, are shown on Table 2. Specific <br />field and offsite test results are provided in Appendix A. <br />A rapid turn-around time of the test results allowed for near real time adjustments to the various slurry <br />trench parameters throughout the project. Testing conformed with industry testing standards, <br />including the American Petroleum Institute -Specifications 13-A, the American Petroleum Institute <br />Recommended Practice -Specification 13-B-2, and ASTM C-143. <br />Slurry viscosity, as measured using a Marsh funnel apparatus, and unit weight, as measured using a <br />mud balance, were maintained in the lower end of the acceptable range (V i 40 seconds-Marsh, S.G. <br />= 1.03 gm/cc to 1.40 gm/cc). In a few instances, the viscosity dipped below 40 seconds-Marsh due to <br />an excess of water in the mix. These cases of low viscosity occurred at either the mixing pond or <br />t discharge hose. The viscosities were corrected at these locations so that the slurry viscosity in the <br />trench was maintained above the minimum acceptable level. <br />Filter cake formation of the slurry and filtrate loss was analyzed using an ambient temperature filter <br />press assembly. Slurry was collected from the trench for this test. Filter cake thickness and filtrate loss <br />was consistently within the acceptable range. Texture of the cake formation ranged from clean to very <br />sandy. A sand content kit was used to measure the percent sand by volume suspended in the slurry. <br />Sand content was found to range from < 0.25 percent to 21 percent. The hydrostatic forces <br /> <br /> -3- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.