My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP22696
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP22696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:25 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:31:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/15/2005
Doc Name
state land board annual status report
From
southwestern ecological services
To
dmg
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT <br />TO COLORADO STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONI?RS <br />SAND AND GRAVEL LEASE: GL-264 (FOURTH AMENDMENT) <br />LOWRY RANGE <br />COAL CREEK (QUINCY AVE. SOUTH TO COUNTY LINIE) <br />SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY <br />APPLICABLE YEAR: 2004 - 2005 <br />DUE DATE: JULY 15, 2005 <br />In accordance with the requirements of Paragraph 6 of the lease and Item LA.S. of the <br />Operation Plan, the following information is provided. This information update:; the previous <br />annual status report information, if any. <br />DATE OF FINAL INSPECTION FOR PREPARATION OF REPORT: July 12, 2005 <br />OVERALL CONDITIONS OBSERVED IN LATE 2004 AND EARLY 2005: The <br />winter of 2004/2005 was fairly normal with periodic periods of snow and cold interspersed with <br />milder weather. Moisture build up in the subsoils was significant during the winter months, but is <br />probably still sub-normal after the long and intense drought of 2001 through 2003. More shallow <br />soils exhibited little surficial cracking as was seen in the winters of 2002 and 2003. This was <br />probably due to the increased moisture. May of 2005 was somewhat unusual in that it was fairly <br />dry, but still provided good moisture to this area to initiate the growing season. 1Ytuch of June <br />was very cool and wet which produced strong growths in cool season and the earlier warm <br />season grasses. Cheatgrass came on much more strongly than can be recalled in recent years <br />where cheatgrass grew very little due to the drought. The spring growing conditions for leafy <br />spurge was near ideal and it made a very strong showing in June. This added growth appears to <br />have primarily been expended in the process of becoming more dominant where it occurs rather <br />than expanding into new areas. In May and June of 2005 an analysis of the weed population with <br />special emphasis on leafy spurge concluded that the spurge infestation has reached a point where <br />it is habitat limited. That is, further large scale expansion is very difficult for this species because <br />there is not much habitat left where the spurge has not already invaded. Additiotral expansion <br />will require significant shifts in the habitat characteristics on the property as most of the uplands <br />appear to be only slightly suitable habitat for this species and it already occupies nearly all of the <br />suitable habitat in the valleys. Nevertheless, increased dominance in those valley habitats is <br />entirely possible and that could inflict fixrther damage on the native species by crowding them out <br />resulting in a significant shift toward even greater spurge dominance. <br />In late June and eazly July, the weather tamed dry and hot. Later warm season species <br />came on strongly and the prodigious growth in the early season grasses ripened. This resulted in <br />an overall condition of the ]and that is faz more favorable than has been seen in recent yeazs. On <br />the whole, the rangeland condition is much improved, with the exception of the incredible <br />growths of cheatgrass. The cheatgrass is a cleaz indicator of how inherently damaged this <br />rangeland is, in spite of how good it might look in some places. In 2005, the primary species of <br />concern is, in fact, cheatgrass and not leafy spurge. The cheatgrass occurs in all habitats, except <br />wetlands, whereas the spurge is limited to only the moist to mesic habitats, does not occur in <br />Annual Status Report - 2005 for State Land Board July 15, 2005 Page 1 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.