My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP21873
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP21873
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:00 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:17:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1982 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT-MT GUNNISON 1 MINE-WATER YEAR 1982
Annual Report Year
1982
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• the lease block showed no correlation among sandstone units <br />within the Barren Member of the Mesaverde Formation (Mt. Gunnison <br />MRP Sec. 2.72). Thus, the volume of water in storage in these <br />sand strata is small and incapable of maintaining even low <br />production for any length of time. <br />More extensive drilling in the vicinity of the mine entry and the <br />future upper waste rock pile further illustrates the lack of <br />continuity within one lithologic. type even for very short <br />distances (Mt. Gunnison MRP, Exhibit 3.2.9.6). <br />Despite the limited potential of groundwater as a resource in the <br />area, an analysis of impacts of mining on groundwater has been <br />• developed. The primary concern with groundwater is the possible <br />impact on springs and the potential for mine water discharge. <br />There are essentially two ways in which mining activities at <br />Mt. Gunnison could affect groundwater. First, construction of <br />mine entries and mining of the coal could cause water to move <br />from formations above the coal seam into the mine. Of particular <br />concern is the role of possible roof collapse and mine subsidence <br />on water-bearing formations above the coal. Second is the <br />possible impact of waste material disposal on groundwater <br />quality. <br /> <br />-29- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.