Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLQRADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl o(Nawral Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 D I v 15 l O N O F <br />Phone: 13031 866-3 5 67 :r MINERAL S <br />FAX: 1303) 832-8106 $c <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />INTERNAL MEMO Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walc her <br />Esecutrve Director <br />M¢hael B. Long <br />TO: Dan Mathews ~ 26 May 2000 Divrsion Director <br />FROM: Jim Bumel• ~. <br />SUBJ: 1999 Annual Hydrology Report for Deserado Mine <br />1 completed a review of the 1999 AHR for the Deserado Mine. Deserado's monitoring <br />requirements have been decreased considerably in recent years because of the dry conditions at <br />the mine site. TR 47 discontinued the surface water monitoring program in 1997 because there <br />was virtually no surface water and monitoring was essentially meaningless. Also, the frequency <br />of monitoring for bedrock groundwater wells was decreased last year. Alluvial groundwater <br />monitoring was greatly decreased by the recent innundation of five of the six wells by the filling <br />of a local reservoir, and monitoring of alluvial groundwater in Red Wash was discontinued <br />several years ago because the objective of the program was attained. <br />In general, the water level in wells a mile or more away from active mining have remained <br />stable. A review of the water level measurements on remaining bedrock groundwater wells <br />don't display any real consistency, except for the fact that they have displayed more variability <br />than wells farther away and the shallow wells have displayed less fluctuation of water level than <br />the deeper wells. <br />Regarding water quality, the alluvial groundwater is of poor quality. This has been noted in <br />previous yeazs. The Hydrology Task Force has recently suggested that all mines analyze for <br />constituents for which a receiving stream standard exists. This applies to discharges or affected <br />water that will flow into the stream in question. It is not clear how Deserado is affected. <br />NPDES discharges which reach the White River should be analyzed for a variety of constituents <br />not currently within the monitoring plan. However, we need to discuss which, if any, of these <br />discharge points may ever discharge into the river and how much water would be involved <br />before any suggestions are made. <br />As of now, the predictions contained within the Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of <br />the permit are borne out and there appears to be no impact from mining on either surface water <br />or groundwater in the area of the Deserado Mine. <br />