My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP21686
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP21686
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:54:55 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:14:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/2/2001
Doc Name
2000 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT
Annual Report Year
2000
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The plots of the historic water levels in the spoil wells are presented on Figures 24, 26, 28, 30, and 31. The <br />water levels normally have a similar pattern to the alluvial wells: they respond rapidly to the spring runoff and <br />then decline rapidly in the summer. Wells 026-SP-I and 026-SP-3 have on occasion been dry by the fall, <br />although this has not happened since 1988. Water levels in these wells closely mirror the pattern of the spoil <br />spring discharges discussed elsewhere in the report. Wells 001-SP-6 and 001-SP-7 reflect fluctuation in the <br />spoil aquifer water table attributable to pumping activities associated with the adjacent Foidel Creek Mine. <br />Water quality data for wells 026-SP-I, 2, and 3 are summarized in Tables 14, I5, and 16 for [he 2000 water <br />year. Tables 14a through ]6a provide period of record statistical summaries of collected water quality data at <br />each site. Figures 25, 27, and 29 provide graphical representations of TDS concentrations recorded at each <br />site. TDS values in all three of these wells are observed to decrease during spring runoff period and increase <br />during the latter part of the water year. <br />Water quality parameters for these sites are typically within previously established ranges with a few exceptions. <br />At site 265P1 (Table 74), new minimum values were recorded for field conductivity, lab pH, bicarbonate, and <br />nitrate. New maximum values were recorded for field conductivity dissolved magnesium, dissolved selenium, <br />nitrite, and ortho-disc phosphate. At site 26SP2 (Table 15), new minimum values were recorded for lab pH <br />and bicarbonate. New maximum values were recorded for sulfate, dissolved selenium, and ortho-diss <br />phosphate. And at site 26SP3 (Table 16), new minimum values were recorded for sulfate and nitrate. New <br />maximum values were recorded for dissolved sodium, dissolved selenium, dissolved manganese, nitrite, and <br />ortho-diss phosphate. <br />In general, the spoil groundwater has comparable TDS concentrations to most of the spoil spring discharge, <br />but much higher values than in the background bedrock ground water. Much of spoil ground water is a <br />calcium-sulfate type with relatively high bicarbonate and low SAR. Spring 114, located just downgradien[ <br />from wells 001-SP-6 and 001-SP-7, typically exhibits higher sodium and sulfate levels than other spoil springs. <br />• The water quality data for spoil wells does no[ indicate any significant changes in trace metals concentrations <br />have occurred over time. <br />SURFACE WATER MONITORING <br />Monitorine(Samnlina Frequency (exceQt as noted): Surface sites monitored under this permit are also monitored <br />under Permit No. C-82-056. Prior to the approval of Perini[ No. C-82-056, TR-35, (May 2000), both permits <br />required 12 flow and field parameter monitoring instances to occur between March and September along with 4 <br />water quality sampling events. In 2000, monitoring/sampling began in the March with exVa monitoring and <br />sampling scheduled through September to provide the required instances. Permit No. C-82-056, TR-35, requires <br />only monthly flow and field parameter monitoring, with only quarterly water quality sample collection. After the <br />approval of TR-35, [he monitoring and sampling schedule was changed [o comply, and the extra <br />moni[oring/sampling was cancelled. As a result, [he 2000 Water Year includes fewer surface water <br />monitoring/sampling instances than normal. Although complying with Petmit No. C-82-056, [his change resulted <br />in missed monitoring/sampling instances for Permit No. C-81-071. <br />Foidel Creek: Four surface flow monitoring sites on Foidel Creek in the vicinity of [he CYCC mined areas and <br />facilities areas are utilized. Site 14 provides data from the undisturbed watershed area adjacent to (northeast <br />of) Eckman Park. Site 800 is located a short distance downstream from Eckman Park below the confluence of <br />the Pond A discharge and site 14 and flows a[ [his station aze monitored by the USGS (Station 09243800). <br />Site 8 is located a short distance downstream of the Foidel Creek mine portal area below Mine 1. And lastly, <br />site 900 is located further downstream above the confluence with Middle Creek. Flows at site 900 are also are <br />. monitored by ttte USGS (Station 09243400). One additional site on Foidel Creek, site 304, required water <br />level tonitoring on a monthly basis in conjunction with alluvial well 008-A V-2. <br />CYCC2000.doc I/3]/Ol <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.