My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP21491
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP21491
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:54:49 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:10:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/17/1984
Doc Name
MEMO EMPIRE ENERGY CORPS FALL 1983 SUBSIDENCE MONITORING REPORT
From
MLRD
To
SANDRA EMRICH
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiiuiii <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 999 <br />David H. Getches. Executive Director <br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />T0: <br />FROM: <br />RE: <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />r 17 February 1984 <br />Sandra Emrich ~ \,' ~ ~~ <br />Jim Pendleton -~--~-`"""~ <br />Empire Energy Corpor~ion's Fall, 1983 Subsidence Monitoring Report <br />(_ i <br />Pursuant to your request, I have completed a review of the Fall, 1983 <br />Subsidence Monitoring Report submitted by Empire Energy Corporation for their <br />Eagle No. 5 & No. 9 Mines Complex. This report observes that the maximum <br />observed subsidence "... is slightly greater than the predicted subsidence <br />using the Abel and Lee equations for subsidence." In the cases of monument <br />rows A and B the overage approaches 30 to 40 percent of the originally <br />predicted maximum value. I do not believe that this degree of overage 1s <br />critical in these particular areas. However, we should review the next report <br />closely, in order to ascertain whether the observed overage continues to <br />increase. It may be necessary to require amendment of the permit document <br />subsidence treatment, if the overage significantly Increases above that now <br />documented. <br />In my memo to you dated January 3, 1984, I reviewed the subsidence monitoring <br />report format proposed by Empire Energy Corporation, in response to <br />Stipulation No. 23 of their approved permit for the Eagle Mine Complex. In <br />that same memo, I recommended the Inclusion of horizontal location survey data <br />within their report format, in addition to the vertical data proposed by the <br />operator. Because my review postdates the operator's submission of their Fall <br />'83 subsidence monitoring report submittal, I do not consider 1t appropriate <br />to require amendment of this report. In the future, however, we should <br />require the inclusion of both the horizontal and vertical monument location <br />survey information within the report. <br />With this understanding, I <br />Monitoring Report submitted <br />No. 9 Mine Complex. <br />cc: Ed Bischoff <br />Doc. No: 9456E <br />recommend that we accept the Fall 1983 Subsidence <br />by Empire Energy Corporation for its Eagle No. 5 6 <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 8020:1 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.