Laserfiche WebLink
Division of Mining and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />December 11, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />the same results, and indicated that they believe <br />samples may have been contaminated. Cadmium was th <br />which exhibited this behavior. we are currently e' <br />our sample collection and handling methodologies, <br />laboratory's, to ascertain the potential sources for <br />contamination. Barring possible contamination, it s <br />that the highest dissolved cadmium concentrations we <br />surface station RS-1; well upstream of any of <br />operations. <br />the dissolved <br />__ only analyte <br />ialuating both <br />is well as the <br />this possible <br />hould be noted <br />re reported at <br />BMG's current <br />As required by the recently-approved TR-06, Table 1 lists the <br />calculated cyanide values from the process point samples. <br />Calculated free cyanide and WAD cyanide were based on the methods <br />described by ASCI in its report dated June 1992. <br />Should you have any questions regarding the data enclosed herein, <br />please feel free to give us a call. <br />Yours truly, <br />~f Topper ~ <br />Senior Hydrogeologist <br />RT/pl <br />Enclosures <br />lcc: A. Walter Wise, Esq. <br />Battle Mountain Gold Company <br />MCorp Plaza, Forty-Second Floor <br />333 Clay Street <br />Houston, Texas 77002 <br />lcc: Ms. Alana Scott <br />Battle Mountain Resources <br />P.O. Box 310 <br />San Luis, Colorado 81152 <br />lcc: Dean Massey, Esq. <br />Parcel, Mauro, Hultin and Spaanstra <br />1801 California Street, Suite 3600 <br />Denver, Colorado 80201 <br />