My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP21102
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP21102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:54:38 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:03:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/31/2000
Doc Name
1999 ARR 1999 WILDLIFE MONITORING
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. January 1996 was substantially greater than the densities recorded during previous surveys. <br />Snowfall from the onset of winter through January 1996 was considerably greater than in other <br />years. Excessive snow probably pushed more animals out of the higher elevations of the <br />Williams Fork Mountains and north into the survey area in January 1996. There was less <br />snow fall in winters 1996-1997 and 1998-1999, and the elk density recorded those winters was <br />very comparable to the density noted in 1995. Although snow fall was also minimal through <br />January 1998, the density of elk in the area at that time was the highest ever observed. <br />Herds were widely distributed over the survey area during each of the six surveys <br />completed since December 1994. However, herds have always been conspicuously absent <br />from the agricultural fields and grasslands in the northwest, north-central, and southeast parts <br />of the area. Because there are no tall grasses or shrubs in those habitats, the vegetation is <br />typically covered by snow in winter. Consequently, there is very little readily available winter <br />forage for big game in those parcels of the survey area. Few herds have been seen on either <br />the Seneca II-W or Seneca [I permit areas during ttte surveys; more herds have been observed <br />on Yoast. <br /> <br />Seneca II-W Mine and Perimeter <br />Observations made on the 35-miZ area that includes the Seneca II-W Mine permit area <br />and its perimeter are listed io Table 1. Twenty-three sightings of elk (245 animals) were made <br />within that area; all of the herds were in the perimeter. Elk density in the area around Seneca <br />ll-W was 7.0 animals/mil. That was 20% less than the density on the expanded survey area. <br />In addition to elk, nine mule deer (one herd), two coyotes, and one golden eagle were <br />recorded in the vicinity of Seneca II-W on 24 February. <br />All of the elk seen Seneca II-W area, except one herd of siz animals, were in mountain <br />brush habitat. As in the expanded survey area, the vast majority of elk seen near Seneca !I-W <br />during all surveys completed since 1994 were in mountain brush. <br />Elk density in the vicinity of Sencca 11-W has been lower than the density recorded in <br />the expanded area during most surveys completed since December 1994 (Figure 1). The flat <br />grasslands and agricultural fields in the northwest corner of the perimeter around Seneca II-W <br />• are usually snow-covered and hold few elk. The scarcity of elk in the northwest part of the <br />1999 Seneca ILW Mine Wildlife Mumtoring Pagc 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.