My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP20637
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP20637
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:49:10 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:56:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/23/1996
Doc Name
1995 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT REVIEW RESPONSE FOIDEL CREEK MINE C-82-056
From
TWENTYMILE COAL CO
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~II ~I~~II~I~~~~~~~~ <br />~ TW6NTYMIL6 sss <br />~ COAL COMPANY <br />A Cyprus Amax Company <br />October 2l, 1996 <br />Twentymile Coal Corporation <br />29515 Routt County Road q 27 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />303-879-3800 <br />RECEIVED <br />ocr z s ~sss <br />Mr. Kent Gorham <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals & Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />oiv~sion or Minerals 8 Geology <br />RE: 1995 Annual HydrologLReport Review Response, Foidel Creek Mine, # C-82-056 _ <br />Dear Mr. Gorham: <br />The following are responses to issues and comments regarding the above-referenced report as per your <br />letter of 2l August 1996. <br />General Comments <br />The October date in Table I for well 009-79-4 is represented as 10/26/95. Should this date read <br />10/26/94? <br />Response: The referenced date should indeed read 10/26/94. Revised copies of Table 1 are enclosed <br />with this correction made. Please replace previously submitted copies with the enclosed copies. <br />2. No elevation information is shorn+•n on Figure 2 for well FBR-l 1B. <br />Response: No monitoring of well FBR-1 I B vas required during the 1995 water year. TCC will <br />revise Figure 2 to provide this information in firture AHR's. It is TCC's intent to utilize Permit No. C-82- <br />056 Map No. 13A as Figure 2 for future AHR's. Since this document is approved under the permit, <br />revisions to this Map must presumably by handled by a formal revision process. TCC is considering an <br />unrelated permitting action which would also involve revisions to Map 13A; our preference would be to roll <br />the elevation designation clmange into the map at the same time. <br />3. Figure 85 y-axis is labeled incorrectly as (cfs). <br />Response: Revised copies of Figure 8~ are enclosed which show the y-axis labeled with (unmhos/corn). <br />Please replace previous)}• submitted copies with the enclosed copies. <br />i:Wocumen0alvUoidcLckV' Salursp.da~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.