Laserfiche WebLink
1972). Mice in captivity regularly drink water, but it is not known whetherZapus <br /> in the field drink or get their water from green vegetation or from dew, or both <br /> (Quimby 1951). <br /> B. Home range- Quimby (1951) found that the home range of female Z. hudsonius <br /> varied from 0.19 to 0.87 acres, with a mean of 0.38 acres, while male home <br /> ranges varied from 0.14 to 1.10 acres, with a mean of 0.43 acres, in one area in <br /> Minnesota. In another area of Minnesota, he found that nine males had <br /> significantly larger home ranges (2.70 acres) than did 17 females (average 1.57 <br /> t 0.22 acres). Calculated home ranges in Michigan were 0,89 t 0.11 for 26 <br /> males, and 0.92 t 0.11 for 24 females, the differences being not significant <br /> (Whitaker 1972). Quimby (1951) theorized that environment plays a major role <br /> in determining the size, and that the shape of home ranges is determined by <br /> terrain, density and type of cover, and land use in the immediate area. Home <br /> ranges shift; in one case an adult moved more than half a mile. <br /> Authors have reported the tendency for Z. hudsonius to wander, possibly to seek <br /> moist locations during the dry part of summer (Whitaker 1972). Quimby(1951) <br /> found them to have essentially no homing tendencies on the basis of releases of <br /> 13 individuals 0.2 to 0.5 miles from their original home ranges. Only two <br /> returned by chance wandering. <br /> C. Population Density- Quimby (1951) estimated that there were 11.91 mice per <br /> acre in one Minnesota study area, and gave monthly averages ranging from 1.81 <br /> to 3.57 mice per acre for a second area. Authors agree that the population density <br /> of jumping mice may vary considerably from year to year(Whitaker 1972). An <br /> inverse relationship may exist between Z. hudsonius and meadow vole (Microtus <br /> pennsyivanicus) densities because both species have nearly identical distributions <br /> over North America and both live in moist meadow habitats (Boonstra and Hoyle <br /> 1986). <br /> D. Population Structure- Quimby (1951) recognized three age classes, namely <br /> adults, subaduls (with adult pelage but of small size), and juveniles (very small <br /> • size and juvenile pelage), in a Minnesota Z. hudsonius population. No young of <br /> the year appeared in the catch until July when 25% were either juveniles or <br /> subaduits. Fifty percent of those caught in August were young of the year. The <br /> figures for September were more difficult to determine since the young from early <br /> litters have all the appearances of adults at this time; but 61% were definitely <br /> young of the year, 8% were definitely adults, the remaining 30% were classified <br /> as adults, but some or all were young of the year. These data indicate that the <br /> over-wintering adults are gradually replaced by the young of the year as the <br /> summer progresses. Factors doubtless include mortality from predation, old age, <br /> and other natural causes. Kmtzsch (1954) concluded that sexes in Z. hudsonius <br /> vary only slightly from a one to one ratio. <br /> E. Predators-Zapus have been reported to be preyed upon by barn owls, mink, and <br /> rattlesnake (Quimby 1951, Krutzsch 1954, Whitaker 1972). Z. hudsonius have <br /> been reported to be preyed upon by barn and long-eared owls, red tailed hawks, <br /> northern pike, weasel, and a green frog (Quimby 1951, Krutzsch 1954, Whitaker <br /> 1972). It seems safe to assume that jumping mice are preyed upon by <br /> representatives of all major vertebrate groups (Quimby 1951). <br /> F. Parasites- Whitaker (1972) provides an excellent summary of the parasites, or <br /> associates, of Z. hudsonius. The species harbors few parasites in comparison to <br /> many other species of small mammals of comparable size. Among bacteria, <br /> FmY O.n,.SL y <br /> Pimp FLS,L= <br />