My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP20211
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP20211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:48:48 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:49:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1997 WILDLIFE MINITORING
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Eighty-three percent of the elk seen (564) were in mountain brush habitat. Rough breaks <br />was the only other habitat the held a substantial percentage (15%) of the elk seen. A few herds <br />were observed in grassland (6 elk), reclaimed grassland (5 elk), and fir (1 elk). <br />In addition to elk, 12 herds of mule deer (67 animals) were seen during the survey. Seven <br />coyotes (Canis latrans) were seen, including a pack of four that had surrounded a cow and two <br />elk calves. Alone red fox (Vulpes vulpes) was spotted in the east central part of the area near the <br />Seneca Mine permit boundary (Exhibit 1). Seven golden eagles and one bald eagle (Ha[iaeetus <br />leucocephalus) were also seen. <br />PRES has surveyed the expanded area three other times; in December 1994, and January <br />1995 and 1996. Results from the 1995 and 1997 surveys were very similar (Figure 1). In <br />contrast, results from the 1994 and 1996 surveys were quite divergent. The very low density <br />recorded during the December 1994 survey was probably a due to poor ground conditions (patchy <br />snow cover) and the use of a fixed-wing aircraft for the survey. Both of those factors affected the <br />observers' ability to detect animals and resulted in undercounting. Observed elk density on 26 <br />• January 1996 was substantially greater than the densities recorded during any other survey. <br />Snowfall from the onset of winter through January 1996 was considerably greater than other <br />years. Excessive snow probably pushed more animals out of the higher elevations of the Williams <br />Fork Mountains and north into the survey area in January 1996. <br />During each of the four surveys completed since December 1994, herds were widely <br />distributed over the entire survey area, but were conspicuously absent from the agricultural fields <br />and grasslands in the north-central part of the area. Because there are no tall grasses or shtvbs <br />in those habitats, the vegetation is typically covered by snow in winter. Consequently, there is <br />very little winter forage for big game in that part of the survey area. Few herds have been seen <br />on either the Seneca II or Seneca II-W permit areas during the surveys; more herds have been <br />observed on Yoast. <br />Seneca II Mine and 1-Mile Perimeter <br />Observations made on the 17.5-mil area that includes the Seneca II Mine permit area and <br />• its 1-mile perimeter are listed in Table 1. Thirty-one sightings of elk were made within that area; <br />one herd (5 animals) was on the permit area and 30 herds (157 animals) were in the perimeter. <br />1997 Seneca Ii Mine Wildlife Monitoring Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.