Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Require- <br /> Require- ment <br />Requirement ment complied Comment <br /> citation with ? <br /> lyes / nol <br />R. Sampling Section <br />frequency of 2.04.7 of <br />ground water CDMG yes <br />monitoring <br />mining <br />wells Permit C- <br /> 81-035 <br />S. Para- <br />meters Section <br />to be x.04.7 of <br />analyze CDMG <br />d in mining yeS <br />ground permit C- <br />water 81-035 <br />sam les <br /> The following two aquifers are [he most likely [o be affected by <br /> mining at King Coal: the Hay Gulch alluvium and the Cliffhouse <br /> Sandstone. The Hay Gulch alluvium is monitored in [he Wil[ze <br /> well, downstream from the west sed. pond. Historical data indicate <br /> CWQCC compliance with the Basic Standards for ground water in this <br />T. Basic regulation aquifer if a compliance point was established a[ the Wil[ze well <br />Standards location. <br />for Ground s <br />41.4 and yeS Although ground water impacts to the Clifthouse Sandstone are <br />Water 41 5 not expected (see Comment AA, below), compliance with the basic <br /> ground water standards in this aquifer is not known because the <br /> Cliffhouse is not monitored. <br /> A regional aquifer about 250 ft. beneath the mine workings, the <br /> Point Lookout Sandstone, was planned for monitoring in late 2000 <br /> in the Hau en well about 5000 ft. down radien[ from [he workin s. <br />U. Restoration <br />of ground <br />water CDMG King Coal's eleven acres of surface disturbance probably is not <br />recharge to regulation yes enough to diminish recharge to aquifers, if any are recharged in the <br />approximate 4.05.11(3) area. <br />premining <br />rate <br />V. Prevention of Compliance with the Basic Standards for ground water, as <br />adverse explained in item T, above, indicate the permittee is preventing <br />impacts to CDMG adverse impacts [o alluvial ground water systems outside [he permit <br />ground water regulation yes area. Impacts to the Cliffhouse Sandstone, if any, are not known <br />systems 4.05.1 I because the Cliffhouse is not monitored. The potential for impacts <br />outside the to the Clifthouse appear unlikely, as explained in Comment AA, <br />ermit area below. <br />Page 3 <br />