Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• <br />• <br />Hydrologic Monitoring Activities <br />The hydrologic monitoring program for the Mt. <br />Gunnison No. 1 Mine began in 1974 with the <br />completion of several groundwater observation <br />wells. This preliminary monitoring network was <br />expanded considerably and in 1981, with the <br />approval of the Mt. Gunnison No. 1 Mine Mining <br />and Reclamation plan (M and R Plan), became the <br />"approved" hydrology monitoring program. <br />In 1984, 1987, and 1989 the program was revised. <br />The ]984 and 1987 revisions were made to more <br />efficiently monitor possible effects from mining <br />and provide data for future permitting. The 1989 <br />revision incorporated provisions for collecting "B" <br />seam baseline data and monitoring for potential <br />mining impacts in anticipation of the 1990 opening <br />of the "B" Seam. All revisions were approved by <br />the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />(CMLRD). <br />The 1990 Annual Hydrology Report contains the <br />following: <br />• Data from Dve continuous Dow monitoring <br />stations; <br />• Data from two U. S. Geological Survey <br />(USGS) continuous Dow monitoring stations; <br />• Data from seasonal water quality sampling at <br />two surface water quality monitoring stations; <br />Surface Water Monitoring <br />West Elk Coal Company's (WECC) surface water <br />monitoring program includes nine monitoring <br />locations (Table 1). The locations of these moni- <br />toring stations arc shown on Exhibit I- Daily Dow <br />estimates (including mean, maximum, and mini- <br />mum Dows) for the five WECC gauges are summa- <br />rized in Appendix A. Except for two stations with <br />a few mechanical problems, the rewrds are <br />complete. <br />'fable l Summary of Surface Water Moni- <br />[nring Program at the Mt. Gun- <br />nison No. l Aline <br />Slalion hlow~s~ Water Quality <br />wt « Sylvester Gulch Cominuous A 3 limes per year D <br />USGS/WECC <br />Gaging Slalion Cominuous Q 3 limes per yrar D <br />Fall Fork Minnesota <br />we rr Creek Flume Continuous R 3 times per year ~ <br />!~~ • • • I-ower Dry Fork Flume Continuous A 3 limes per year D <br />~, r . r Upper Dry Fork Flume Continuous A 3 times per year A <br />v ' •r Lick Creek Flume Continuous A 31ima per year A <br />North Fork Upper -- 3 times per year ? <br />North Fork Lower -- 3 limes per year J <br />USGS North Fork <br />gaging Slalion <br />near Somerset Continuous ~ -- <br />• Data from seasonal measurements oC pH, <br />temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and <br />conductivity at the six stream gauging stations <br />in the Minnesota Creek Basin and Sylvester <br />G u Ich; <br />• Data from seasonal measurements of dis- <br />charge and water quality sampling at seven <br />springs issuing from or below the "F" scam <br />coal; <br />• Data from seasonal water level and water <br />quality measurements at 23 wells; and <br />• Data from measurements of mine water <br />discharges and mapping of inflow locations. <br />Stilling wells at the five WECC gauges began <br />freezing in October. By the middle of the Decem- <br />ber, all were frozen. Thawing began in February, <br />but it was early April bc(ore all stilling wells had <br />thawed. Debris buildup in the Dumes was minimal <br />during 1990 and no data were lost due to debris. <br />In addition to the five WECC monitoring loca- <br />tions, Dow data are available from two USGS <br />monitoring stations. These stations are Minnesota <br />Creek downstream of Dry Creek and the North <br />Fork of the Gunnison River near Somerset, Colo- <br />rado. The North Fork station is located approxi- <br />mately t/a-mile upstream of the mine site. Because <br />the USGS gauging stations arc heated, they were <br />unaffected by freezing temperatures. Data for the <br />]m <br />