Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data In+erprcta+ion and lmpac+ Assr_snnen+ for the Permit and Adjacrnt Arear <br />North Fork Water <br />During water year 1982, the conditional right to <br />withdraw water from the North Fork was deemed <br />absolute. When this water right is in priority, water <br />can be pumped from the intake point to the <br />freshwater storage pond(s) within the surface <br />facilities area. In average years, this water right is <br />expected to be out of priority from July to Septem- <br />ber. In 1977, it would have been out of priority <br />from April to September. in water year 1986, <br />WECC's Mt. Gunnison Pipeline water right met <br />quadrennial diligence for the conditional portion. <br />Accordingly, an additional portion was deemed <br />absolute by the Division 4 Water Court. That <br />decision brought the absolute portion to 0.88 cfs. <br />The ]0-acre-foot capacity pond (FW-1) provides <br />for water storage during the current permit term; <br />an additional pond (SW-2) is anticipated for <br />subsequent permit terms. Water can also be stored <br />in Sediment Ponds MB-1, MB-2, and MB-3 under <br />a separate decree. Storage is usually limited to the <br />maximum sediment level elevation. Transfer to <br />FW-1 is possible as outlined in the M & R Plan. <br />Average withdrawals are not expected to exceed <br />50,000 gpd during the term of permit and are likely <br />to be on the order of 45,000 gpd, depending on <br />production levels and requirements. During 1990 <br />average withdrawal was 97,000 gpd for 250 working <br />days. This two-fold increase in usage can be attrib- <br />uted to the drilling and blasting work completed in <br />the "B" seam slopes and ventilation raise. <br />Water from the freshwater pond(s) is used in two <br />ways. It can be treated to meet potable and sani- <br />tarywater requirements, used, and then treated as <br />sanitary waste water. Or, it can be withdrawn (or <br />dust suppression in the mine, in which case it then <br />becomes mint water. <br />WECC's Mt. Gunnison pipeline water rights were <br />out of priority during a portion of water year 1990 <br />(from approximately July to September). Average <br />daily low flow in the North Fork during water year <br />1990 was 210 cfs. The maximum withdrawal at the <br />intake is 450 gpm with both pumps operating. This <br />is less than 0.5 percent of the observed average <br />daily tow Oow in the river during the water year. <br />Sanitary Waste Water <br />The sanitary waste water treatment plant has been <br />operating since the fall of 1982. During water year <br />1990, discharge From the plant averaged 3700 gpd. <br />This discharge is approximately 0.0027 percent of <br />the average daily low (low of 210 cfs observed in <br />[he North Fork during the year. <br />Discharge monitoring results from the wastewater <br />treatment plant, wnducted under NPDES Permit <br />No. CO-0038776, are included in Appendix J. The <br />results of the analyses suggest the waste water <br />discharge has no measurable effect on water <br />quality in the North Fork Gunnison River. <br />Mine Water <br />Mine inflows during water year 1990 were small. <br />The total mine water inflow was 61.50 acre feet <br />during the year. The total water exiting the mine is <br />estimated to have been 58.25 acre feet. <br />The quality of mine water is considered good and <br />offers no problem for Ircatmcnt and discharge. <br />Mine water was primarily discharged from the <br />No. 2 Portal. No discharges occurred from Sylves- <br />ter Gulch. <br />Mine water inflow for water year 1991 is expected <br />to be less than that experienced during water year <br />1990. After construction of "B" seam slopes and <br />raise and rehabilitation of "F' seam entries are <br />complete, only the amount of water necessary for <br />mining will be imported into the mine. Mine water <br />is expected to have water quality characteristics <br />similar to that reported in Table 5. <br />Because of the small yuamity of mine water <br />anticipated, any discharge from ponds would <br />normally be dominated by water quality charactcr- <br />istics of disturbed area runoff as described in the <br />following section. <br />Runoff from Disturbed Area <br />Overland runoff from snowmelt and precipitation <br />within the disturbed areas is routed to one of six <br />sediment ponds on the mine site. The six sediment <br />14 <br />