My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP19457
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP19457
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:48:09 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:39:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/10/2003
Doc Name
2002 Annual Hydrology Report Review Checklist
From
DMG
To
WWC Engineering
Annual Report Year
2002
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Requirement <br />Requirement <br />citation Require- <br />ment <br />complied <br />with ? (yes <br />Ino <br /> <br />Comment <br />F. Antidegradation CWCC <br />regulations <br />The Edna Mine is not subject to the Antidegradation Rule because the receiving waters, <br />Rule for Surface 3.1.9(2) and yes Segment 13c in Region 12 of the Yampa River basin, are designated "Use-Protected". <br />Water <br />3.3.0. <br /> Ground water in the Trout Creek alluvium is the only ground water that could be adversely <br /> affected by the Edna Mine. (Bedrock aquifers that abut spoil backfill probably are too <br /> impermeable to transmit leachate.) Edna monitors alluvial water quality in two <br /> downstream alluvial wells, TR-3 and TR-4. Data from both wells indicate mining has not <br /> caused adverse impacts to the quality of ground water at these locations. The mine is in <br /> compliance with the Basic Standards for Ground Water at these two locations, should a <br /> point of compliance be established at either location. <br /> Hydrogeology of West Ridge area inferred from cross-sections and density logs in <br /> Section 2.l of the permit: <br />G. Basic Standards Geometry of saturated Zone in spoil that feeds Spoil Spring 7 -Cross-section G-G' <br />(Interim CWQCC shows the maximum thickness of the saturated zone in the spoil aquifer occurs near <br />Narrative regulation Yes well PM-7 where it is about 50 ft. thick (assuming: the base of the spoil aquifer is at <br />Standard) for 41.S.C.6 the base of the Wadge coal, former well PM-7 is [he lowest elevation of the Wadge <br />Ground Water where it was mined, and the top the saturated zone is the elevation of Spoil Spring 1 <br /> (7137t1.). The minimum thickness is near former hole B.H. 24-5-73 (in cross-section <br /> F-F') where it is about 25 ft. thick. G-G' and F-F' indicate the saturated zone feeding <br /> Spoil Spring Icovers about 400 acres in Sections 13 and 14, 4N-86W. <br /> Bedrock in low-wall ofpit may be a permeability barrier to subsurface discharge of <br /> leachate where leachate has maximum head -Cross-section G-G' shows that spoil <br /> probably abuts only shale in the low-wall of the pit at former well PM-7, thus <br /> preventing leachate discharge into bedrock at this location where head at the base of <br /> the saturated zone is at its maximum of 50 ft. <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.