My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP18833
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP18833
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:47:39 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:29:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/2/1997
Doc Name
PREDICTED LONGWALL SUBSIDENCE FOR THE SANBORN CRK MINE OXBOW CARBON MINERALS INC SOMERSET CO
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I Sanborn Creek Subsidence Page 15 September 2, 1997 <br />LONGWALL PANEL TROUGH SUBSIDENCE PREDICTION <br />It was necessary to calculate vertical subsidence from <br />longwall mining individual panels before proceeding with prediction <br />of panel group subsidence. These predictions were made using the <br />NCB (1975) "Subsidence Engineers' Handbook", which was developed <br />from 187 case histories of subsidence monitoring. The Handbook <br />states, <br />"Prediction of subsidence by the above method should be <br />correct to 10$ in the great majority of cases." <br />Individual panel subsidence prediction probably represents the most <br />accurate part of longwall subsidence prediction. However, the <br />' prediction method is for independent isolated panels. Multi-panel <br />layouts are simply treated as wider panels by the NCB method. The <br />use of single entry gateroads at the full mining height in Great <br />Britain eliminates the gateroad pillar subsidence effect. This <br />would be unrealistic for the planned panel groups because of the <br />B.5-ft high three-entry gateroads, the 50-ft and 30-ft wide <br />_ gateroad pillars and the 12-ft longwall panel mining height. <br />Table 9 presents the predicted worst-case subsidence <br />predictions for each of the individual 12-ft high planned longwall <br />panels shown on Figure 1. Subsidence predictions were made for <br />1 panel profiles perpendicular to the center of the panel starter <br />room face, at each panel ribside at a distance of one-half the <br />planned panel width inside the panel from the starter room, at the <br />ribside location of each depth contour shown on Figure 1, at the <br />center of the recovery room and at each panel ribside at a distance <br />' of one-half the planned panel width inside the panel from the <br />recovery room. <br />As indicated on Table 9, subsidence profile input data <br />included whether the subsidence prediction should be reduced <br />1 because parts of the overlying ground had not previously been <br />subsided by mining in the Oliver No. 1 Mine or the Hawksnest Mine. <br />The NCB (1975) "Subsidence Engineers' Handbook" states, <br />"When considering workings with any w/h value in a virgin <br />area the prediction from Fig. 3 (which was derived from <br />cases of multi-seam workings) should be reduced by a <br />multiplying factor of 0.9." <br />I The predicted maximum vertical subsidence (Smax) of the ground <br />surface was obtained along each of the profile locations described <br />' above for an individual panel by multiplying the 12-ft longwall <br />' mining height by the panel width/depth correction factor. The <br />panel width/depth correction factor graph is included in Appendix <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.