My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-10-10_REPORT - C1984062
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1984062
>
1990-10-10_REPORT - C1984062
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2021 4:05:44 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:28:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/10/1990
Doc Name
AHR REVIEW RESPONSE
From
CYPRUS YAMPA VALLEY COAL CORP
To
MLRD
Annual Report Year
1989
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
David Berry <br /> October 8 , 1990 <br /> Page Two <br /> CYCC Response: <br /> Cyprus pumps some bedrock wells one day and then samples them one <br /> to two days later. This is done because of the low yield of some <br /> of the bedrock wells. The water level measured before the well is <br /> pumped is the static water level. Water levels should not be <br /> recorded for the day the well is sampled because the measured water <br /> level may not be representative of the static water level since it <br /> has been recently affected by the pumping. <br /> MLRD CONCERN: <br /> 3 . It appears that the lead value for well 008-77-58 (May 18, <br /> 1989) is a data entry error. Please correct as needed. <br /> CYCC Response: <br /> The lead concentration of 20 ug/l for well 008-77-58 measured on <br /> 18 May 1989 appears to be a good measurement. The reported <br /> concentration is at the detection limit of 20 ug/L and is within <br /> the range normally reported from some of the bedrock wells. <br /> MLRD CONCERN: <br /> Alluvial Wells - <br /> All requirements were met. <br /> CYCC Response: <br /> No response necessary. <br /> MLRD CONCERN: <br /> Spoil Wells - <br /> 1. Why were the various metals analyzed by the total recoverable <br /> method rather than the dissolved method, for well 008-SP-5A <br /> (May, 1989) ? <br /> CYCC Response: <br /> The laboratory erred and analyzed the sample by the total <br /> recoverable method instead of the dissolved method. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.