My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP18291
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP18291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:47:10 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:22:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/26/1996
Doc Name
1995 AHR ROADSIDE MINE FN C-81-041
From
DMG
To
BARBARA PAVLIK
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iii~iiiuiiii iii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AtJD GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl or Nalu ral Resource, <br />1313 Sherman SL, Rnom 21 5 <br />Denver,. Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 1303) 866-3567 <br />FAX. 13031 832-8106 <br />r'1 r r .. I~~~~ <br />FwED <br />.1Ut, 2 6 1996 NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />DATE: Jul)+ 24, 1996 <br />TO: Barbara Pavlik <br />FROM: Dan Mathews ~~~~ <br />RE: 199!i AHR, Roadside Mine <br />File No. C-81-041 <br />oiviei(7n of Minerals & Gec~iogy Ruy Rumer <br />Goverrux <br />lames 5 Lnchhead <br />Eaeculive Dueclnr <br />Michael B Lnng <br />Div i~ion Dircnnr <br />Enclosed is the 1995 Roadside AHR, which was submitted a couple <br />months late a,s has been the case for the last couple years. With <br />this submittal, all of the 1995 AHR's for my mines have been <br />submitted. According to my records, we have not yet completed the <br />reviews for Deserado and Tomahawk. I received a ground water <br />review memo from you for Tomahawk last week, and am awaiting Susan <br />Burgmaier's surface water review. I did an initial review on <br />Deserado, which I sent to you in a memo of April 8. Missing data <br />referenced in that memo was subsequently provided by WFU on April <br />il, 1996, and I think I forwarded copies of the revision pages to <br />you. If not, let me know. Also let me know if your records are <br />different than mine with regard to AHR review status for my mines. <br />Roadside 1995 AHR Initial Review <br />i have compl~ated the initial review and am requesting the more <br />detailed review of the above referenced AHR. I found the following <br />apparent discrepancies in the initial review. <br />1. Water levels were not reported for the quarter beginning <br />January, 1995, for the UTL wells, and levels for UTL-O1 and UTL-03 <br />were not reported for the quarter beginning October, 1994. No <br />explanation was provided. <br />2. All required quarterly CRDA piezometer water levels were <br />reported, except for N307 for which water levels were not reported <br />in April, July, and September, 1995, due to "difficulty of <br />sampling". <br />3. There were no flow measurements reported for June and July, <br />1995, for Surface Water Sta. SWGS-03. No explanation is provided, <br />but I recall that one or more gaging stations were washed out by <br />high flows on Cottonwood and Rapid Creek last year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.