My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP18266
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP18266
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:47:09 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:21:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1988 AHR text and data
Annual Report Year
1988
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> <br />while the alluvium in the vicinity of TR-3 intersects stratigraphy below the <br />' Wadge Seam. Alluvium in the vicinity Of TR-9 intersects even lower <br />stratigraphic units than those at TR-3. The influence from contact with the <br />' differing lithologies is not able to be quantified, therefore, differences <br />between the wells may not be responses to mining related activities. <br />' The general characteristics: temperature (figure 7) and pH (Figure S) show <br />the expected trends with temperature exhibiting typical seasonal fluctuations <br />and pH remaining constant over the monitoring period. <br />' Specific conductivity (Figure 8) values for the three alluvial wells have <br />remained fairly constant over the period of record and consistent with values <br />' obtained during the baseline studies. Conductivity values during 1988 for the <br />spoils well WR-1 are similar to previous years with elevated levels caused by <br />' the leaching of various elements continuing within the unconsolidated spoils <br />aquifer as flow passes through. The spring (NPDES discharge point No. 006) <br />associated with the spoils aquifer would be expected to have similar values as <br />' evidenced by comparable TDS concentrations. TDS values (Figure 9) closely <br />follow the specific conductivity for all the wells, as expected. <br />1 Calcium (Figure 9) is the major cation found in all the wells with <br />concentrations of magnesium (Figure 10) and sodium (Figure 11) occurring in <br />1e39er qudntltie9. TR-1.5 generally COntain9 the lowest COnCentrdtiOR9 Of <br />cations with a slight increase occurring downstream at TR-3 and TR-4. WR-1 <br />exhibits a fairly constant concentration of calcium over time, while a <br />' lowering of sodium appears to be offset by an increase of magnesium. During <br />1988, a short-term shift occurred in the relative concentrations of calcium <br />and sodium. The cause of this is unknown, but may be related to the early <br />summer flushing of the spoils from snowmelt infiltration. <br />' Bicarbonate (Figure 10) and sulfate (Figure 11) are beginning to show a <br />trend of topological change similar to that observed in the surface waters. <br />' Upstream (TR-1.5) of the spoils spring, bicarbonate is the major anion with <br />sulfate concentrations increasing rapidly along the mine area resulting in an <br />equalization of the sulfate and bicarbonate components occurring downstream <br />' (TR-3 and TR-4). This increase may be caused by the spoils spring discharge <br />where leaching of pyritic and organic sulfur occurs as the flow passes through <br />the spoils. <br />Dissolved iron and manganese remained at low levels during 1988 as in <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.