My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP18195
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP18195
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:47:06 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:20:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/17/2004
Doc Name
2002 AHR, Subsidence & Mine Inflow Adequacy Review Letter
From
DMG
To
J.E. Stover & Associates
Annual Report Year
2002
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman S[., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866.3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832106 <br />February 17, 2004 <br />COLORADO <br />D [VISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAM ATION•MINING <br />SAFETY•ECIENCF <br />Bill gsvens <br />Governor <br />Jim Stover, P.E. RnSEeu ceorse <br />J.E. Stover & Associates Executive Director <br />2768 Compass Drive, Suite 101 Ronald W. Cattany <br />Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />RE: Bowie No. 1 Mine, Permit No. C-81-038, Bowie Resources Limited <br />2002 Annual Report, Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Stover: <br />The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (Division) has finished its review of the Bowie <br />Resources Limited (BRL) submittal of the 2002 Annual Report for the Bowie No. 1 Mine. <br />2002 Annual Hvdrolo>;v Renort (AHRI <br />The Division agrees with BRL's conclusion that the mining operations at the Bowie No. 1 East <br />Mine, West Mine and unit train loadout has not adversely affected the hydrologic regime. The <br />water quality data show consistency with previous operational and baseline data. The results of <br />the water quality and quantity analyses also demonstrate that the concentrations of chemical <br />pazameters were well within the acceptable limits. However, due to the very dry yeaz, many sites <br />were dry so only limited water sampling could be run. The Division has the following questions <br />and comments: <br />1. There are several wells that do not appear to have the required full suite analyses. For <br />instance, according to Table 1 of the 2002 AHR, the SM series of wells aze required to <br />have semi-annual full suite analyses. However, the 2002 AHR data sheets show that only <br />an annual full suite analysis was run. Also, according to Table 1, wells MW-1 and MW-3 <br />require quarterly full suite analyses. However, MW-1 has no fourth quarter and MW-3 <br />has no first and fourth quarter full suite analyses. Please explain. If the reason is that there <br />was not enough water for such analyses, please state that in the field comments for each <br />sampling event. <br />2. Two springs, S3100 and S3200, were sampled for full suite analyses on a semi-annual <br />basis. However, Table 1 shows that full suite analyses need to be run on a quarterly basis. <br />Please explain. <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.