My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP18188
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP18188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:47:05 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:20:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/1/1985
Doc Name
CYCC MINE NO 1AND 2 AND ECKMAN PARK MINES 1984 ANNUAL HYDROLOGIC REPORT FN C-79-177
From
MLRD
To
DAN MATHEWS
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br /> <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Getches, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION Dl~i <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />DATE: November 1, 1985 <br />T0: Dan Mathews <br />FROM: Bob Liddle ~~ <br />RE: CYCC, Mine No. 1, 2, and Eckman Park Mines 1984 Annual Hydrologic <br />Report - File C-79-177 <br />As you know, the CYCC AHR was used this past summer to update the CHIS for <br />Seneca, as well as to assist the Mined Land Reclamation Division during the <br />summer field sampling program. <br />Although it is late into the year, I feel all AHR's should be reviewed and <br />commented on for the operator's benefit. This will be done in the future. <br />The 1984 AHR submitted by CYCC was a complete compilation of data collected at <br />the mines. I found the organization easy to follow. My only major problem <br />was with the lack of a large scale map which would have made it easier to <br />identify sample locations. <br />The report does not discuss new springs, interpretation of data, water <br />consumption, trends, or verification of predicted impacts. However, it <br />appears that MLRD never specifically made this a requirement of CYCC. <br />Our own interpretation of the data has raised some concerns that have already <br />been forwarded to CYCC. Although it appears that some monitoring requirements <br />could be reduced, without some interpretation by CYCC. I cannot recommend any <br />reduction or termination of the monitoring requirements at this time. <br />Please relay my apologies to CYCC for the delay in responding to this report. <br />/ph <br />Doc. No. 4640 <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.