Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Demos Jones <br />Seneca Coal Company <br />Page 2 <br />September 23, 2005 <br />The discussion contained in the AHR and Tab 7 of the Seneca II-W PAP should be verified and <br />substantiated through a ground water point of compliance analysis and implementation as <br />required by Rule 4.05.13(1). As described in Regulation No. 41 The Basic Standards for <br />Ground Water ,ground water may be assigned more than one class because it may have more <br />than one existing or potential use. The point of compliance analysis needs to consider both <br />existing and potential future uses. <br />Based on review of baseline and other AHR data and using the Interim Narrative Standazd <br />approach it appears that at a minimum, Potentially Usable Quality may apply to ground water <br />within the Seneca II-W Mine permit boundary and surrounding area. The TDS Water Quality <br />Standazds given in Table 4 of Regulation 41 apply to ground water classified as Potentially <br />Usable Quality. <br />As indicated in the 2004 AHR, increasing TDS trends are beginning too be observed at most <br />wells down gradient of mining, and agricultural ground water standards were exceeded in 2004 at <br />certain monitoring wells. TDS concentration increases aze evident in alluvial ground water in <br />locations along Hubberson Gulch and Sage Creek. <br />The Division has the following comments regazding water quality monitoring at the Seneca II-W <br />mine site and the data and information presented in the 2004 AHR. <br />As you know, the Division informed our coal-mine operators in a letter dated August 13, <br />2001 of a significant revision to Rule 4.05.13 regarding establishing ground water points <br />of compliance. Rule 4.05.13 requires that One or more points of compliance be <br />established for any coal mining operation, which in the opinion of the Division, has the <br />potential to negatively impact the quality of ground water for which quality standards <br />have been established by the Water Quality Control Commission. Based on review of <br />recent Annual Hydrology Reports, it appeazs that the Seneca II-W mining operation may <br />have the potential to negatively impact ground water and therefore the Division believes <br />that it is necessary at this time to review the current monitoring program to deterrine the <br />need for points of compliance. <br />Please review your ground water monitoring program specific to establishing points of <br />compliance at your site, and provide the Division with your input and feedback. The <br />Division will work with you to identify the need and if necessary, to determine the <br />specific location(s) for ground water points of compliance. <br />