My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984-06-20_REPORT - M1978352 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1978352
>
1984-06-20_REPORT - M1978352 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 2:42:33 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:15:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978352
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/20/1984
Doc Name
RECLAMATION COST ESTIMATE
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL FEE / REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Productivity: [(4 mph) x (5,280 ft) x (12 ft) . 43,560 ft2/acre] <br /> x 0.80 availability = 4.65 acres/hour <br /> Cost: ($144.23/hour) t (4.65 acres/hour) = $31.02/acre <br /> Productivity Assumptions for Topsoil Replacement <br /> Use Caterpillar 637D Scraper for topsoil replacement. <br /> Average haul distances from soil stockpile will vary depending on the <br /> particular area of the mine. Projected scraper productivities for <br /> various haul distances at approximately 5% rolling resistance are shown <br /> in the following table: <br /> Haul Distance - One Way Production(1) Production <br /> (feet) (bcy/hr) (bcy/hr) <br /> (100% Efficiency) (83% Efficiency) <br /> 60 min hour 50 min hour <br /> 200. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .900. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .750 <br /> 300. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .860. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715 <br /> 400. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .820. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .680 <br /> 500. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .780. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .650 <br /> 600. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .740. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .615 <br /> 700. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 700. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .580 <br /> 800. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .660. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .550 <br /> 900. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .640. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .530 <br /> 1000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .600. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .500 <br /> 1500. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .510. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .425 <br /> (1) Production estimated from Caterpillar Performance Handbook, Edition <br /> 14, page 237 <br /> -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.