My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP17574
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP17574
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:46:36 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:11:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/2/1987
Doc Name
SENECA II-W 1986 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT PN C-82-057
From
PEABODY
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3. On Page 91, the statement is made that there does not appear to be <br />any distinct trends in TDS values at Station FG1. There appears to <br />be a gradual trend toward a minimum value in 1983 followed by a <br />gradual rise in later years. The report states there is a general <br />inverse relationship between flow and TDS at all stations. It is <br />suggested that a regression equation be developed to quantify this <br />relationship. A similar equation, developed after mining <br />commences, would be an instructive measure of changes in TDS, if <br />any, due to mining. <br />RESPONSE: <br />Peabody will further investigate the relationship between streamflow and <br />TDS. Attempts will be made to develop a regression equation describing <br />this relationship and the results will be presented in a future AHR. <br />4. In the discussion of springs on Page 107, the report states that <br />for the Olson Springs (5-45), the concentration of sulfate does not <br />meet CDH Secondary Drinking Water Standards. Since no data has <br />been reported on Table 30 for sulfate it is difficult to verify the <br />accuracy of this statement. <br />RESPONSE: <br />Sulfate values were inadvertently left off of the data base. AHR <br />replacement Pages 108 and i06a detail the sulfate levels at Olson <br />Spring. <br />5. Peabody Coal Company should, upon completion of all new hydrologic <br />monitoring sites, submit all pertinent completion information to <br />the Division for the purpose of updating monitoring site records. <br />RESPONSE: <br />Following their completion, Peabody <br />pertinent completion and aquifer test <br />II-W hydrologic monitoring sites. <br />attachments to the Seneca II-W Permit. <br />will submit to the CMLRD all <br />information for the new Seneca <br />fhe submittal will consist of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.