My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP17528
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP17528
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:46:34 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:10:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/30/1997
Doc Name
Historic Record Study Area, 1997 Characterization
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VIII. DISCUSSION <br />1996 PRECIPITATION REGIlI4E <br />Based on a comparison of precipitation records from the Paonia 1 SW station, the 1996 <br />growing season was significantly drier than average. The growing season precipitation <br />sum from 1995-1996 was 7.78 inches of precipitation, compared with the average of <br />11.08 inches. As this precipitation total is less than the dry year threshold value of <br />8.45 inches, vegetation sampling from the 1996 growing season should adequately <br />represent vegetation cover, herbaceous production, and species composition from a dry <br />precipitation year as envisioned in the historic record concept for the West Elk Mine. <br />COMPARATIVE VEGETATION COMMUNITY SAMPLING AT THE WEST <br />ELK MINE <br />The historic record vegetation community closely resembles the vegetation community <br />identified as dry meadow in the baseline vegetation survey conducted prior to <br />permitting of the West Elk Mine. The dry meadow community has been extensively <br />sampled during the last fifteen years. In doing so, a record of the characteristics of this <br />community has been established. A comparison of the parameter values from the dry <br />meadow vegetation community with those of the historic record vegetation community <br />was undertaken to evaluate the nature of the historic record vegetation community <br />relative to the dry meadow community. In 1982, both the dry meadow affected area <br />vegetation community and dry meadow reference area vegetation communities were <br />quantitatively sampled. In 1995, the dry meadow reference azea was sampled _. <br />quantitatively (Savage and Savage, 1995). Values from those studies and parameter <br />values from the 1996 historic record vegetation community sampling are provided in <br />Tables 8 and 9. <br />A comparison of total mean vegetation cover from the three sample yeazs and four <br />sample vegetation communities (Table 8) illustrates the correlation between growing <br />season precipitation and plant growth. In 1982, the growing season precipitation sum <br />was 11.42 inches, not significantly different than the average of 11.47 inches. Dry <br />meadow vegetation communities produced vegetation cover ranging from 40.97 to <br />46.85 percent. In 1995, where growing season precipitation was 24.06 percent greater <br />than average, the dry meadow reference area vegetation community showed a <br />corresponding increase in total vegetation cover of 39.16 percent. In 1996, when the <br />growing season precipitation was 67.86 percent below average, the historic record <br />vegetation community showed the lowest total vegetation cover of the sampling years <br />reviewed. <br />Herbaceous production from the three sampling yeazs and four vegetation sample <br />locations also appeared correlated to growing season precipitation, though not as <br />-16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.