My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP17462
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP17462
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:46:31 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:08:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/27/1994
Doc Name
MITIGATION/SAFETY OPINION REQUEST SUBSIDENCE CRACK FEATURES
From
DMG
To
JIM PENDLETON
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiniu iii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SI., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80207 <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 <br />FAJ(: (3031 832-8106 <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />RE: <br />October 27, 1994 <br />Jim PendletonGG <br />David Berry'1~' <br />Mitigation/Safety Opinion Request -Subsidence Crack Features <br />~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Ramer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />Ezecmive Direcm~ <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Direcla <br />Susan McCannon asked that I request your opinion as follows. Significant surface crack <br />features are appearing at both the Cyprus Twentymile and Mountain Coal sites. Some of <br />these features are large enough to pose significant safety hazards to unwary humans or <br />animals. The cracks are generally located in relatively remote rangeland and wildlife habitat <br />auras; however, it is possible that livestock or a stray hunter could fall into one of these <br />features. <br />Wha[ mitigation measure(s) do you recommend for these situations? Backfdling would be <br />possible, but probably impractical given the locations. Fencing and signing would be <br />possible, but the operators seem to be reluctant to do this. We are concerned that in the <br />absence of any recommendation to mitigate or secure the larger features, we may have a <br />considerable liability. <br />Your opinions are appreciated. Thanks for your help! <br />cc: Susan McCannon <br />Kent Gorham <br />Christine Johnston <br />M:\OSS\amm\memojap. dab <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.