My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP17255
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP17255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:46:19 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 2:05:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/30/1999
Doc Name
1998 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT REVIEW
From
DMG
To
BASIN RESOURCES INC
Annual Report Year
1998
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ron Thompson <br />Pale 4 <br />04/30/99 <br />approximately .3 gpm. Springs #1 5, #16, and #17 in and near Ciruela Canyon <br />were dry or had very small flows. Spring #18 in Parras Canyon was about .3 gpm. <br />Spring #20 in Santistevan Canyon was flowing at 15 gpm. Wet Canyon springs <br />were flowing at approximately 3-7 gpm. Springs #26 and #27 remain at about .5 <br />gpm. Conductivity readings indicate water quality is suitable for livestock and <br />wildlife use. No impacts to springs due to mining are apparent. However, given <br />the apparent drawdown to the overburden and coal seam, there is the potential that <br />spring flows have been reduced or re-located, especially to the north of the mined <br />area. As the water levels recover in the bedrock aquifers, flows in some springs <br />may increase. However, most springs are related to isolated perched aquifers in <br />the overburden or shallow rider coals seams and have not been impacted by mining. <br />The primary reason for changes in spring flow are climatic changes, specifically <br />precipitation variation. <br />Summary <br />Monitoring frequency compliance was excellent during 1998. Surface water <br />quantity and quality changes are small to non-existent. Surface water impacts are <br />not expected. Ground water quantity impacts appear possible and continued <br />monitoring through the bond liability period should assist in positive identification of <br />mining impacts. Ground water quality impacts are not apparent and initial field <br />paramaters taken from the mine workings indicate impacts to ground water quality <br />are unlikely, as mine water appears to be of similar quality as the baseline ground <br />water quality. Actual water samples of the flooded mine workings are scheduled <br />when mine flooding allows the retrieval of a water sample. <br />This concludes the Divisions review of the 1998 Annual Hydrology Report for the <br />Golden Eagle mine. Thank you for your diligence in completing the approved <br />monitoring program. <br />Sinc ely ~~ <br />Ke t Gorham <br />Environmenta4 Protection Specialist <br />cc: Dan Hernandez, DMG <br />Jerry Koblitz, Greystone <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.