Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to 200 ft across. As a result of these anomalies, the strike of the foliation joints varies <br />by 45 degrees either direction from the predominant strike direction and the dip <br />typically varies by 35 degrees or more. <br />5. Spacing of joints in the primary joint set typically ranges from several inches to <br />approximately three ft. Joint surfaces vary greatly from fresh to highly-weathered. <br />Weathered schist interbeds having a slick and weak character are frequent throughout <br />[he rock mass. <br />At least two secondary joint sets are present, often orthogonal with the primary joint <br />set. These secondary joints typically occur at intervals of one to five ft. In general, <br />secondary joint surfaces are planar, and are fresher and less weathered than the <br />primary joints along foliation and do not exhibit the smooth schist or mica surfaces. <br />The slope of the debris below the newly-excavated benches was measured at a dip of <br />approximately 43 degrees from horizontal. <br />Based on the conditions observed with the present exposures, the rock mass exposed is <br />consistent with the conditions used as the baseline for analyses of the East Highwall. This <br />evaluation may change as additional rock is exposed in this area. <br />The predominant dip angle is slightly steeper than [he inclination of the overall slope and, <br />as a result, the joints typically plunge into the slope but daylight on the vertical and near <br />vertical individual highwalls. <br />One of the primary concerns is that alarge-scale preexisting joint or shear feature exists, <br />which would allow for alarge-scale slope failure. Review of the rock exposures did not <br />reveal any features noted to be of concern which extended more than two benches. How- <br />ever, the most likely problem feamre would be a shallow dipping joint which daylights and <br />could form an unstable wedge near the base of the slope. ]t is likely that any such features <br />would be obscured by the slope debris below the freshly-excavated benches. <br />Localized block and wedge failures of the outside edges of the benches are common in the <br />upper two highwalls: These upper two highwalls are typically in the more weathered rock <br />near the ground surface and were drilled vertically. In areas where the outside of the <br />benches have fallen away, the bench width has decreased by approximately 5 to IS ft. <br />One crack was noted at [he south end of the upper highwall and extending [o the east by <br />up to 10 ft. After careful review, it was determined that this feature is probably limited to <br />the upper highwall and bench and does not extend further downhill. However, this feamre <br />will continue [o be observed as excavation continues. <br />Localized block and wedge failures of the outside edges of the third and fourth benches are <br />common but less prevalent than in the upper nvo benches. This difference in behavior is <br />attributed to the sloped highwalls (from the angle drilling) and from the lesser degree of <br />weathering of the parent rock material resulting in a better quality rock mass. <br />Geometry of the slope is such that the fourth bench will likely have to be less than the <br />planned 50 to 60-ft width. Based on the observed conditions that the rock quality has <br />increased below the upper two benches, a bench width between 40 and 50 ft is expected to <br />G.~l@OO~R09000.300 <br />