Laserfiche WebLink
Raton Creek Mine <br />2000 AHR -Page 2 <br />Well levels for both monitoring wells are presented graphically on Figures 1 and 2 for the <br />Refuse and Iuppa Wells, respectively. A review of water levels data shows steady levels in <br />the Refuse Well during the reporting period. Water well levels at the Iuppa Well tended to <br />Fluctuate similar to previous trends, and were lower on average. The Fluctuations are likely <br />influenced by the landowner's use of the well, while the lower levels may reflect the low <br />amount of precipitation during the reporting period. <br />The approved ground water monitoring program adequately monitors potential impacts of <br />mining on the ground water system. The data collected through the period of this report <br />indicate that no significant ground water impacts have occurred as a result of mining. <br />Surface Water and NPDES Discharees <br />Field and laboratory data collected from the approved monitoring point on the Starkville <br />Diversion are shown on water quality Table 4. Diversion flow measurements are summarized <br />on Table 5. No surface flows were monitored in the permanent diversion during the repotting . <br />period. <br />Monitoring data for the one NPDES outfall for the reporting period are summarized and <br />shown on to Table 1. Post-mining discharge monitoring parameters include flow, settleable <br />solids, pH, and oil and grease under the approved Colorado Wastewater Discharge permit. A <br />review of these data indicate that all discharges were within NPDES permit limitations. <br />The approved surface water monitoring program effectively monitors the impacts of mining <br />operations on the surface water system adjacent to the Raton Creek Mine site. Monitoring <br />data documented through the period of this report indicate no significant impacts to surface <br />water as a result of mining operations. <br />Preci~tation Information <br />Precipitation data for the reporting period is summarized and shown on Figure 3. Total <br />precipitation for the year was below the average total documented in the permit application, <br />and approximately 33 percent less than the previous year. Storm events tended were <br />intermittent, similar to the previous reporting period, and not cause significant erosion or <br />structural damage on the site. The lack of precipitation, however, inhibited vegetation growth <br />during the middle and late growing season. <br />