Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br />south and west parameters had been shaped, construction of the main <br />subsurface drain system was begun. Along roost of the alignment, the drain <br />trench was excavated about 5 feet below the ground surface and at least one <br />foot into bedrock. Along much of the alignment, the drain was excavated <br />almost entirely into bedrock. Photograph 5 shows some of the trench <br />excavation. <br />The depth to bedrock increased to more than 12 feet at tl~e north end of tfie <br />west drain line. About the northern 200 feet of the line was bottomed in <br />stiff clay, at least 5 feet below the ground surface. We do not believe <br />that this variance from plan along the northern 200 feet of the drain line <br />will adversely affect stability of the waste bank. Any leaching which is <br />developed through the pile should flow over the relatively impermeable <br />clays and be collected in the drain. <br />After excavation of the drain trench, the trench was lined with Mirafi 140N <br />filter fabric and a 6-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe placed as shown on <br />Photograph 6. The trench was filled with free draining gravel and the <br />filter fabric Taped across the top of the gravel as shown on Photograph <br />7. At least 8 inches of gravel was then placed over the lapped filter <br />cloth far protection from vehicle traffic. Photograph 8 shown a completed <br />section of the subsurface drain. Figure 1 presents the results of a <br />gradation analyses which was conducted on a sample of the drainage <br />gravel. The results of the analyses indicates that the material used meets <br />the specifications shown on the construction plans. <br />There was an existing coal processing waste stockpile in the southern <br />portion of the site. Photograph 9 shows a portion of the pile. The stock- <br />pile was spread across the southern one-half of the waste bank area after <br />the area had been shaped and compacted. The area below the stockpile was <br />then compacted. Photograph 10 shows a portion of the waste bank area after <br />the previous processing waste had been spread. Photograpi~ 11 shows an <br />overall view of the disposal area. <br />As of our site visit made April 22, 1982, topsoil and organic matter had <br />been removed from the coal processing waste bank area. Tlie subsurface <br />drain had been installed in 'general conformance with our recommendations. <br />The ground surface across most of the site had been shaped to drain towards <br />-, the toe drain. It,aPpears that major low areas which would have tended to <br />• collect water had been filled. <br />Surface diversion ditches had been constructed as of our visit made May 6, <br />1982. In general, the ditches_appeared to have been consl:ructed in general <br />conformance with the design cross-section. There were some isolated areas <br />where the ditch did not appear to be at least 3 feet deep and the grade of <br />the channel appeared to be flatter than 1 percent. The placement of <br />rip rap, where required, had yet to be completed and the channel had not <br />been seeded. Mr. Rick Mills of Empire Energy and Mr. Jerry Jones of <br />Palisade Construction were informed of the work to be accomplished on the <br />surface diversion ditches. <br />