My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP16529
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP16529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:45:48 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:54:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/2/1995
Doc Name
1994 AHR: Text & Table of Contents
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report 1994
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ALLUVIUM <br />Sediments in the Williams Fork River Alluvium are monitored. Three wells are in the <br />general area of the loadout facilities and underground discharge sediment ponds. <br />WATER LEVELS <br />Groundwater levels in the alluvium have remained fairly regular, with normal seasonal <br />fluctuations, apparently related to changes in river levels. Groundwater levels in the <br />alluvium are plotted in Figure 22. A piezometric map for the Williams Fork Alluvium is <br />presented in Figure 23. The data indicates no impact on alluvial water levels related to <br />mining. <br />WATER QUALITY <br />Summaries of the water quality data for the alluvial wells are presented in Tables 23 and <br />• 28. A plot of field electric conductivity versus time is presented in Figure 24. There is no <br />conclusive evidence of seasonal variation of water quality in the alluvium. The field <br />conductivity of Well AVF-5 was above normal in late 1983 and early 1984. The laboratory <br />measurements did not show the same high levels during that period. Only Well AVF-3 is <br />showing an upward trend in dissolved solids. There is also a correlative increase in <br />calcium, magnesium, sulfate and chlorides. The source of this change is not known. <br />However, it is unlikely due to mine discharge because its location and the dissimilar <br />chemical composition of mine discharge. Also, it is unlikely due to the waste water lagoon <br />because the conductivities in the well exceed the levels-measured in waste water. <br />• <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.