My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP16255
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP16255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:45:36 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:49:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1996 Revegetation Monitoring Report
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Native perennial fortis, Introduced perennial (orbs, Native perennial graminoids (includes <br />grasses and grass-like plants), Introduced perennial graminoids, Shrubs (all of these being <br />native at this site), Trees (likewise all native in the study area), and Ferns. <br />Plant Species Frequency and Density Measurements <br />During the course of cover sampling, all plant species occurring within one meter on either side <br />of the cover sample transect were noted as present within each sample. Frequency for each <br />plant species observed during sampling was calculated by dividing the number of sample <br />transects in which the species was observed by the total number of samples (see cover sample <br />distribution by area above). As such, this value is probably more correctly known as <br />"constancy". Relative vegetation cover was calculated by dividing the absolute cover of each <br />species by the total vegetation cover with the result expressed as a percent. <br />The total number of species (within each liteform) observed in each sample provide a measure <br />of "species density", indicating relative species richness of different areas. These measures <br />reflect progress toward return of diverse species composition in the reclaimed areas from a <br />• different perspective than is available from examination of cover data alone. <br />Plant Species Listing <br />During the course of the field work, a list of all encountered plant species (quantitative plus <br />incidental observations) was compiled for each reclamation area and the two reference areas. <br />Scientific names used follow Weber and Wittman (1992); common names cited may be found in <br />Beetle (1970), Nickerson et al. (1976), or SCS (1979). Cross reference to the substantially <br />revised scientific nomenclature for the flora of Western Colorado, as set forth by Weber <br />(1987), may be determined by reference to Weber and Wittman (1992). References for <br />noxious weeds included Thornton et al.(1974) and Routt Co. Extension Agent, personal <br />communication (1993). <br />Reference Area Sampling <br />The Mountain Brush and Sagebrush reference areas were sampled to provide data for <br />comparison with reclaimed area data. Cover and herbaceous production data were collected as <br />they were in the reclaimed areas. <br />• <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.