My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP16255
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP16255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:45:36 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:49:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1996 Revegetation Monitoring Report
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• S22 = variance among elements within primary units relative to the Rimary unit means <br />N =total number of primary units that exist (and are to be potentially sampled) <br />n =number of primary units actually sampled <br />M =total number of sample elements that which exist within each primary unit <br />m =number of primary unit elements (2mx50m sample transects) actually sampled in each <br />primary unit <br />u <br />Confidence limits for comparisons to reference areas were calculated using the formula for <br />Post-mining Comparisons on page 17 of CMLRB (1988), using an estimated t-value of 1.65. <br />Confidence limits for areas not being compared to a reference area (i.e. shrub density), were <br />calculated as 1.65 standard errors of the mean, i.e.: <br />s <br />conf. interval = 1.65 <br />u <br />~In <br />The cover performance standard shown in Figure 1 was calculated in accordance with <br />procedures contained in the Seneca II permit based on the weighted average of herbaceous cover <br />in the Mountain Brush and Sagebrush reference areas. Weighting was based on Mountain Brush <br />as 83 percent and Sagebrush as 17 percent of premining vegetation cover. This weighted <br />average (36.4 percent) was multiplied by 2 as per permit formula to obtain the standard (72.8 <br />percent), 90 percent of which was used to place the line on Figure 1 at 65.5 percent. <br />Climatic Data <br />Precipitation data from the Seneca II Mine for the period of January 1982 through Juty 1996 <br />were provided by SCC. Since the long-term average for the mine exists for only 10 years, the <br />long term average monthly precipitation data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric <br />Administration (NOAA) for the nearby town of Hayden was used as an appropriate base for <br />comparison. Information on degree-days was also derived from the NOAA records at Hayden. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.