My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-12-11_REPORT - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2001-12-11_REPORT - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 4:05:45 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:38:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
AHR text
Annual Report Year
1989
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> <br />• <br />Dora lnrerprcrarion wd lmpacr Assesstnmr for Permir Area and Adjacrnr Arcot <br />not appear to be a continuing problem. During <br />1989, both conductivity and TDS values were <br />within the ranges of baseline values. <br />Refuse pile monitoring wells GP-3 through GP-5 <br />remained dry throughout water year 1989. Also, <br />there was no flow from the toe underdrain during <br />water year 1989. However, pond MB-6 collected <br />surface runoff from the refuse pile and can be <br />considered representative of refuse pile conditions. <br />A sample taken from MB-6 on 2 May 1989 indicat- <br />ed pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, <br />TDS, TSS, iron, and manganese were 9.2, <br />2.09 mmhos/cm, 9.4 percent, 582, 1672 mg/I, <br />184 mg/I, 23.29 mg/I, and O.17 mg/I, respectively. <br />The amount of refuse material placed in the lower <br />refuse pile is highly dependant on conditions <br />encountered in the mine. Projected refuse produc- <br />tion for 1989 is approximately 50,000 tons from <br />"F" seam mining and 55,000 tons from "B" seam <br />slope development. <br />ASSESSMENT OF SPRINGS <br />A comparison of 1989 monitoring data with previ- <br />ous years shows no significant trends or changes <br />which can be associated with mining activity. Most <br />springs arc responsive to spring runoff, but Ilow <br />rates are sporadic and many times do not correlate <br />well with other seasonal parameters such as snow- <br />pack, precipitation, or streamflow. <br />ASSESSMENT OF SURFACE <br />WATER AND AVF'S <br />Efforts were made in previous annual reports to <br />characterize baseline river water quality. The <br />purpose was to evaluate potential changes in <br />surface water quality due to mining activities at the <br />Mt. Gunnison No. 1 Mine. Continuous monitoring <br />of stream flows and periodic monitoring of spring <br />discharge rates are performed to provide the long <br />term data base from which possible impacts of <br />mining can be assessed. <br />BASELINE CHARACTERIZATION OF <br />WATER QUALITY AND <br />STREAMFLOW <br />A baseline characterization of North Fork water <br />quality was performed in previous annual reports <br />to evaluate the potential changes in North Fork <br />water quality that could result from discharges at <br />the Mt. Gunnison No. 1 Mine. Baseline character- <br />ization was performed downstream of the mine <br />before the start of construction in August 1981. <br />Data sources were the USGS stream gauging <br />station on the North Fork near Somerset and the <br />West Elk Coal Co. water quality monitoring <br />station on the North Fork below the mine. Both <br />stations were downstream of the surface facilities <br />area and downstream of all discharge points. <br />Baseline data and analysis of these data are provid- <br />ed in the Mining and Reclamation Plan for the Mt. <br />Gunnison No. 1 Mine and in the first annual <br />hydrology report. <br />COMPARISON OF BASELINE WATER <br />QUALITY WITH OPERATIONAL <br />DATA <br />O(the ten parameters selected Car baseline charac- <br />terization, seasonal trends are apparent for TDS, <br />TSS, and total iron. The other parameters do not <br />exhibit seasonal variation. Total dissolved solids <br />are least concentrated in the North Fork during <br />the period between about May and July. The likely <br />reason for this pattern is during this period <br />high-TDS groundwater is diluted by snow runoff. <br />Total iron is most concentrated during this period. <br />Total suspended solids are most concentrated from <br />April to July. <br />A comparison of baseline water quality data in the <br />North Fork of the Gunnison River with 1989 <br />monitoring data shows no significant changes in <br />water quality in the North Fork. No apparent <br />changes in the water quality of the North Fork of <br />the Gunnison River can be attributed to affects of <br />mining during water year 1989. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.