Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Requirement Require- <br />ment Complied with? <br />Comment <br /> citation (yes I no) <br />T. Prevention of <br />impacts to The postmining land uses of rangeland/wildlife, <br />ground water CDRMS pastureland, and cropland will not use ground water. <br />that adversely regulations <br />Yes <br />Consequently, any impact to ground water will not <br />impact the 4.05.1(2) and impact the postmining land use in the permit azea. <br />postmining land 4.05.11 <br />use within the <br />ermit area <br /> The disturbance to the hydrologic balance within <br />U. Minimization of and adjacent to the permit area caused by mining <br />disturbance to the CDRMS and reclamation at the Eagle Mines is the <br />hydrologic regulation es minimum that can be expected from an <br />balance within <br />4.05.1(1) y underground mining operation at this location. <br />and adjacent to Use of best management practices indicates <br />the permit area minimization of disturbance to the hydrologic <br /> balance. <br /> Mining and reclamation at the Eagle Mines have <br /> not caused impacts to the hydrologic balance <br /> outside the permit area. The probable hydrologic <br /> consequences (PHC) section of the permit <br /> application projects future impacts to be minor. <br /> In 4'h quarter 2005 Eagle's mine water discharge <br /> reached a new high for TDS of 2600 mg/I, The <br />V. Prevention of discharge occurred as the pumps were reactivated <br />material damage CDRMS after being idle for a few months. This mine water <br />to the hydrologic regulation yes having TDS of 2600 mg/1 was dischazged at a rate <br />balance outside 4.05.1(1) of 3.33 cfs to the Williams Fork River when the <br />the permit azea receiving river water probably had TDS of less <br /> than 300 mg/ with flow of around 30 cfs. This <br /> discharge would have caused TDS in the river to <br /> rise to 530 mg/I, calculated as follows: [(30 cfs) X <br /> (300 mg/I) + (3.33 cfs) X (2600 mg/I)] / [(30 cfs + <br /> 3.33 cfs)] = 530 mg/I. The calculated 530 mg/I is <br /> well below the CDRMS material damage suspect <br /> level of approximately 700 mg/I for the Yampa <br /> River Basin. <br />W. Requirement to The previously mentioned calculated TDS of 530 <br />keep information mg/I in the Williams Fork River is less than the <br />current maximum predicted in the Probable Hydrologic <br /> Consequences (PHC) section of the permit <br /> CDRMS application. Long-term (following cessation of <br /> regulations mining) mine water pumping will cease at the <br /> 2.05.6(2) and yeS Eagle Mines but there may be mine water seepage <br /> 2.03.3(1) of less than 1 cfs to the Williams Fork River <br /> through the coal seam outcrops (see DBMS <br /> Memorandum in SL-2 bond release file, dated <br /> 4/5/05). The PHC adequately accounts for this <br /> ossible see a e. <br />Page 4 <br />