Laserfiche WebLink
PART II <br />Page No. 28 <br />Permit No. CO-0034142 <br />(Continued) <br />ii. The Division has received new information which was not available at the time of permit issuance (other than revised <br />regulations, guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the application of different permit conditions at the . <br />time of issuance. For permits issued to new sources or new dischargers, this cause includes information derived from <br />effluenrtesting required under Secfion 61.4(7)(e) of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations.. This provision <br />allows a modification of the pemnt to include conditions that are less stringent than the exsting pemrit only fo the extent <br />allowed under Section 61.10 of the Colorado Discharge Pemilt System Regulations. <br />iii. The standards or regulations on which the permit was based have been changed by promulgation of amended standards or <br />regulations or by judicial decision after the permit was issued. Permits may be modified during their terms for this cause <br />' only as follows: - <br />{A) The permit condition requested to-be modified was based on a promul"gated effluent limitation guideline, EPA <br />approved water quality standard, or an effluent ]imitation set forth in 5 CCR 1002-62,' 62 et seq.; and . <br />(B) EPA has revised, withdrawn, or modified that portion of the regulation or effluent limitation guideline on which the <br />.permit condition was based, or Las approved a Commission action with respect to the water quality standard or <br />-- effluent limitation on which the permit condition was based; and - °- <br />(C) The perminee requests modification after the notice of final action by which tLe EPA effluent limitation guideline, <br />water quality standard, or effluent limitation is revised, withdrawn, or modified; ar <br />(D}.For judicial decisions, a couri of competent jurisdiction has remanded and stayed EPA promulgated regiilat{ons or <br />effluent limitation guidelines, if tLe remand and stay concern that portion of the regulations br guidelines on which the <br />permit condition was based and a request is filed by the permittee in accordance with this Regulation, within ninety <br />(90)'days of judicial remand. , <br />iv. The Division determines that good cause exists to modify a permit condition because.of events over which the permittee <br />has no control and for which there is no reasonable available remedy. <br />v. The permittee Las received a variance. , . <br />. vi: WLen required to incorporate applicable toxic effluent limitation or standards adopted pursuanbto' 307(8) of the Federal <br />act, .. . <br />vii. When required by tLe reopener conditions in the permit. <br />viii.:As necessary under 40 C.F.R. 403.8(e), to include a compliance schedule for the development of a pretreatment program <br />ix. When the level of discharge of any pollutant, which is not limited in tLe permit, exceeds the level, which can be achieved <br />by tLe technology-based neahnent requirements appropriate to the permittee under Section 61'.8(2) of the Colorado <br />- -Discharge Permit System Regulafions. - - ---- - - - <br />x. To establish a pollutant notification level requued in Section 61.8(5) of the Colorado Discharge; Perrot System <br />Regulations. <br />xf. To correct technical mistakes, such as erors in calculation, or mistaken interpretations of law made in detemtining permit <br />conditions, to the extent allowed in Section 61.10 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations. <br />xii. When required by a permit condition to incorporate a ]and application plan for beneficial reuse of sewage sludge, to revise <br />an existing ]and application plan, or to add a land apphcatron plan. <br />xiii. For any other cause provided in Section b1.10 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations. <br />c. At the request of a permittee, the Division may modify o: terminate a pemrit and issue a new pemrit if the following conditions <br />are met: <br />i. The Regional Administrator has been notified of the proposed modification or temnnation and does not object in writitt] <br />within 22tirty (30) days of receipt of notification, <br />ii. The Division finds that the pemtittee has shown reasonable grounds consistent with the Federal and State statutes an <br />regulations for such modifications or termination; <br />iii. Requirements of Section 61,15 o€the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations have been met, and <br />iv. Requirements of public notice Lave been met. <br />